On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
...
>>
>> This is a more complicated package than PIL, but I think one should work
>> with it
>> (which I plan to do) before proposing what Sage should include.
>
>
> I see, thanks. Post here how it goes.
I have looked at both VIPS and P
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:54 PM, J Elaych wrote:
>
>
>>
>> > I'd like to hear what other people think: is that factor of 1.5 or
>> > 2.0 in speed
>> > enough to motivate switching to vips for the default sage imaging
>> > library?
>>
>> Is PIL really the default? I did not know that.
>>
>> I don'
>
> > I'd like to hear what other people think: is that factor of 1.5 or
> > 2.0 in speed
> > enough to motivate switching to vips for the default sage imaging
> > library?
>
> Is PIL really the default? I did not know that.
>
> I don't mean for my comments to be interpreted for or against PIL.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:09 PM, J Elaych wrote:
>
> Interesting, but I'm especially impressed by how well PIL stands up
> to VIPS. It looks like vips was primarily designed to have a small
> memory
> imprint, especially for image files that are larger than physical
> memory. PIL
> takes only ab
David Joyner wrote:
> I have some comment below but would like to first make some general
> observations.
> Certainly I am not the expert on image processing but I have now spent
> a week or 2 on
> PIL. I know others have spoken in favor of PIL (I think Jason Grout
> and maybe some others)
> and t
Interesting, but I'm especially impressed by how well PIL stands up
to VIPS. It looks like vips was primarily designed to have a small
memory
imprint, especially for image files that are larger than physical
memory. PIL
takes only about 1.5 times as long as vips on a dual core processor,
so I
wo
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:02 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>>>
>
> ...
>
>>
>> So what are the arguments against PIL and for VIPS?
>
> Here are two reasons ("Why use VIPS?")
> http://www.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>>
...
>
> So what are the arguments against PIL and for VIPS?
Here are two reasons ("Why use VIPS?")
http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk/supported/7.18/doc/html/vipsmanual/vipsmanualse13.
2009/7/13 William Stein :
>
> 2009/7/13 Minh Nguyen :
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> What I hate about PIL is the lack of docstrings with example doctests.
>>> But honestly, I hate this about Python standard library too!
>>>
>>> Things like this:
>>>
>>>
2009/7/13 Minh Nguyen :
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>
>
>> What I hate about PIL is the lack of docstrings with example doctests.
>> But honestly, I hate this about Python standard library too!
>>
>> Things like this:
>>
>> In [1]: a = "s"
>>
>> In [4]: a.format?
>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> What I hate about PIL is the lack of docstrings with example doctests.
> But honestly, I hate this about Python standard library too!
>
> Things like this:
>
> In [1]: a = "s"
>
> In [4]: a.format?
> Type: builtin_function_or_met
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> I have some comment below but would like to first make some general
> observations.
> Certainly I am not the expert on image processing but I have now spent
> a week or 2 on
> PIL. I know others have spoken in favor of PIL (I think Jason Gro
I have some comment below but would like to first make some general
observations.
Certainly I am not the expert on image processing but I have now spent
a week or 2 on
PIL. I know others have spoken in favor of PIL (I think Jason Grout
and maybe some others)
and that motivated me to spend some tim
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:14 AM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>>>
>
> ...
>
>>>
>>> 4. Should I interface also with pyglet classes? (Pyglet is included with
>>> sympy, hence with sage, and
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>>
...
>>
>> 4. Should I interface also with pyglet classes? (Pyglet is included with
>> sympy, hence with sage, and does some very very basic "image
>> processing".) Again, I don'
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> I'm working on a user-friendly, intuitive interface to PIL and have some
> questions. Before preparing a patch, I was hoping that members of this
> group would suggest ways to proceed.
>
> Here is what I've done so far: in the module
16 matches
Mail list logo
