[sage-devel] Re: PEP for new inline operators for Python

2008-11-04 Thread Fernando Perez
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry to reply to myself, but I also believe that Fernando is subscribed > to this list, so he might see your comments here as well. Yes, I am, and I'll be happy to update the doc before sending it to python-dev with any fe

[sage-devel] Re: PEP for new inline operators for Python

2008-11-04 Thread Jason Grout
Jason Grout wrote: > Ronan Paixão wrote: >> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:56 -0600, Jason Grout escreveu: >>> On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates >>> for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address >>> matrix multiplication versus element-wise m

[sage-devel] Re: PEP for new inline operators for Python

2008-11-04 Thread Jason Grout
Ronan Paixão wrote: > Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:56 -0600, Jason Grout escreveu: >> On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates >> for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address >> matrix multiplication versus element-wise multiplication. Fernando

[sage-devel] Re: PEP for new inline operators for Python

2008-11-04 Thread Ronan Paixão
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:56 -0600, Jason Grout escreveu: > On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates > for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address > matrix multiplication versus element-wise multiplication. Fernando > Perez has put together