Hi,
This is an official statement from Odlyzko giving us permission to
distribute any data on his webpage with Sage.
William
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrew Odlyzko
Date: Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Optional spkg databases scheduled for
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, October 21, 2013 2:49:00 AM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I have been
>>> meaning to dig into the various CC licenses, and figure out which
>>> ones I should put up on my web site, ..
>
>
>
> The best one, in my eyes, fo
We are not linking to the database (doesn't even make sense). CC BY and CC
BY-SA is "good for educational works" according to the FSF. They are
incompatible with the GPL when applied to software and documentation, but
that is clearly not the case here.
I don't think Andrew's answer can be const
On Monday, October 21, 2013 2:49:00 AM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>> I have been
>> meaning to dig into the various CC licenses, and figure out which
>> ones I should put up on my web site, ..
>>
>
The best one, in my eyes, for this kind of application is CC0
http://creativecommons.org/publicdom
On Saturday, October 19, 2013 11:05:44 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> There are a number of optional databases without or with incomplete
> SPKG.txt. If nobody knows the copyright status of the following optional
> spkgs then they will have to be deleted:
>
> database_sloane_oeis
>
>
A pity
>
>
> Prof. Odlyzko, is there any copyright status we could put on your zeta
> function database to keep it a legitimate part of Sage? It is obviously
> extremely useful to have as (an optional) part of this open source software.
>
Andrew replied but isn't on sage-devel so it probably was not
On 20 October 2013 03:17, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:07 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, October 19, 2013 5:05:44 PM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
>>>
>>> There are a number of optional databases without or with incomplete
>>> SPKG.txt. If nobody knows the copyright st
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:07 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, October 19, 2013 5:05:44 PM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> There are a number of optional databases without or with incomplete
>> SPKG.txt. If nobody knows the copyright status of the following optional
>> spkgs then they will h
On Saturday, October 19, 2013 5:05:44 PM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> There are a number of optional databases without or with incomplete
> SPKG.txt. If nobody knows the copyright status of the following optional
> spkgs then they will have to be deleted:
>
> cunningham_tables
> database_jone
On 10/19/13 4:19 PM, David Joyner wrote:
Info on the OEIS license is here:
http://oeis.org/wiki/User:N._J._A._Sloane/Discussion_of_Licenses
The punch line seems to be at the very bottom of the page:
Resolution, February 2011
After two months of discussion (not shown here), the OEIS Foundation
10 matches
Mail list logo
