[sage-devel] Re: New machine in the sage.math network

2009-05-06 Thread mabshoff
On May 6, 1:21 am, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2009-May-04 19:26:13 -0700, William Stein wrote: > > >Unfortunately, it seems that this does *NOT* mean that if you write a > >little C program, spawn 128 threads, and watch them run, then you can > >do 128 times what you would do with 1 thread.  You

[sage-devel] Re: New machine in the sage.math network

2009-05-04 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:53 AM, William Stein wrote: > > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Dan Drake wrote: >> Just as an amusing note about the T2, I started compiling 3.4.2 on that >> machine (mostly to just see what happens), and in the FLINT test suite I >> saw this: >> >> Testing fmpz_poly_e

[sage-devel] Re: New machine in the sage.math network

2009-05-04 Thread William Stein
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Dan Drake wrote: > Just as an amusing note about the T2, I started compiling 3.4.2 on that > machine (mostly to just see what happens), and in the FLINT test suite I > saw this: > >  Testing fmpz_poly_evaluate_divconquer()... Cpu = -4008787 ms  Wall = 286189 > ms

[sage-devel] Re: New machine in the sage.math network

2009-05-04 Thread mabshoff
On May 4, 8:49 pm, Dan Drake wrote: Hi Dan, > Just as an amusing note about the T2, I started compiling 3.4.2 on that > machine (mostly to just see what happens), and in the FLINT test suite I > saw this: > >   Testing fmpz_poly_evaluate_divconquer()... Cpu = -4008787 ms  Wall = 286189 > ms >

[sage-devel] Re: New machine in the sage.math network

2009-05-04 Thread Dan Drake
Just as an amusing note about the T2, I started compiling 3.4.2 on that machine (mostly to just see what happens), and in the FLINT test suite I saw this: Testing fmpz_poly_evaluate_divconquer()... Cpu = -4008787 ms Wall = 286189 ms Uh oh. :) Dan -- --- Dan Drake - KAIST Department o

[sage-devel] Re: New machine in the sage.math network

2009-05-04 Thread mabshoff
On May 4, 7:26 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:50 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > > On May 4, 11:39 am, Tom Boothby wrote: > >> Recently, Sun donated a new machine to the Sage community.  It's a Sun > >> T5240 with two SPARC T2 processors (8 cores total) and 32GB of RAM, > > > Wel

[sage-devel] Re: New machine in the sage.math network

2009-05-04 Thread William Stein
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:50 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > > > On May 4, 11:39 am, Tom Boothby wrote: >> Recently, Sun donated a new machine to the Sage community.  It's a Sun >> T5240 with two SPARC T2 processors (8 cores total) and 32GB of RAM, > > Well, it has 128 "threads". Unfortunately, it seems

[sage-devel] Re: New machine in the sage.math network

2009-05-04 Thread mabshoff
On May 4, 11:39 am, Tom Boothby wrote: > Recently, Sun donated a new machine to the Sage community.  It's a Sun > T5240 with two SPARC T2 processors (8 cores total) and 32GB of RAM, Well, it has 128 "threads". > and runs Solaris 5.10.  As with the other machines in the network, you > have acc