[sage-devel] Re: Naming question: monomial vs term

2010-01-15 Thread Jason Bandlow
Jason Bandlow wrote: > Is everyone OK with > term = coefficient * monomial ? Does anyone know of a part of Sage that > is currently not consistent with this? Thanks for your feedback, everyone! term = coefficient * monomial it is. Cheers, Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage

[sage-devel] Re: Naming question: monomial vs term

2010-01-13 Thread Michael Brickenstein
+1 for consistency. However, you should really get rid of these evil coefficients, then you can use term as synonym for monomial ;-). Cheers, Michael -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@goo

[sage-devel] Re: Naming question: monomial vs term

2010-01-13 Thread Simon King
On 13 Jan., 23:29, Tom Boothby wrote: > > Singular and Magma seem to agree with Sage.  MuPAD uses the opposite > > convention.  Both show up in the literature.  Is everyone OK with > > term = coefficient * monomial ? +1 It seems to be used consistently in Sage, so, it wouldn't be wise to change