On 13 Okt., 15:43, kcrisman wrote:
> > > 2) I *think* that report 21 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/
> > > 21) is correctly listed on the front page as "tickets you've
> > > participated in", but is *not* correct on the page of reports (http://
> > > trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report)
> > 2) I *think* that report 21 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/
> > 21) is correctly listed on the front page as "tickets you've
> > participated in", but is *not* correct on the page of reports (http://
> > trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report) where it says, "Open tickets I
> > particip
On 13 Okt., 11:34, leif wrote:
> - We /may/ add "confirmed" for duplicate/invalid tickets to replace
> "positive review", which would IMHO be more appropriate or intuitive.
And / or -- even better -- add "duplicate" to the ticket *types*,
instead of (just) using a special milestone for these.
On 12 Okt., 16:01, kcrisman wrote:
> I don't know how to change Trac's settings. But here are two things
> that someone should change, that are hopefully (?) easy.
>
> 1) I've been a little annoyed that sometimes people set a ticket to
> 'needs info', and then the only option is to set it to 'nee
On 12 Okt., 16:01, kcrisman wrote:
> 2) I *think* that report 21 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/
> 21) is correctly listed on the front page as "tickets you've
> participated in", but is *not* correct on the page of reports (http://
> trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report) where it says,
