On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:44 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, January 4, 2013 1:28:11 PM UTC-5, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>>> Having a full url for the ticket makes it click-able if your terminal is
>>> smart enough.
>>>
>>
>> On this
On Friday, January 4, 2013 1:28:11 PM UTC-5, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Volker Braun
> > wrote:
>
>> Having a full url for the ticket makes it click-able if your terminal is
>> smart enough.
>>
>
> On this note, it would be lovely to have a full clickable URL in
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Having a full url for the ticket makes it click-able if your terminal is
> smart enough.
>
On this note, it would be lovely to have a full clickable URL in trac email
messages as well.
- Robert
--
You received this message because you are
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> While we are at it, why not just
>
> === cython-0.14.1.p3 (http://trac.sagemath.org/10493) ===
>
> Your name is already in the commit message and and on trac. If you really
> like to see it you can still add it below the headline.
>
> Date is
On 2013-01-04 14:17, Volker Braun wrote:
> While we are at it, why not just
>
> === cython-0.14.1.p3 (http://trac.sagemath.org/10493) ===
>
> Your name is already in the commit message and and on trac. If you
> really like to see it you can still add it below the headline.
I don't mind.
--
Yo
While we are at it, why not just
=== cython-0.14.1.p3 (http://trac.sagemath.org/10493) ===
Your name is already in the commit message and and on trac. If you really
like to see it you can still add it below the headline.
Date is useless. Its also duplicated in the commit.
Having a full url fo
On 2013-01-04 14:04, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> I like it much better than having to search for tickets number on trac
> (which if you recall used to be horribly slow although this is now
> solved)
> but some will claim this is too much bureaucracy :)
Not if the Trac ticket number is added automat
In fact, why not generate the whole subtitle automatically?
I'm not sure if its worth the effort if we are going to switch things
around with the move to git in the spring...
On Friday, January 4, 2013 12:55:44 PM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Based on an idea of Robert Bradshaw, I propose th
I like it much better than having to search for tickets number on trac
(which if you recall used to be horribly slow although this is now solved),
but some will claim this is too much bureaucracy :)
We could also agree on date format, commit message formats, etc.
And, just kidding, what if the re
