On Jun 28, 2007, at 16:30 , David Roe wrote:
> Sorry I didn't reply earlier.
Not a problem.
> Implementing an is_symmetric function for matrices sounds like a
> good idea.
> But I think it should go in the base class: something like
That was my feeling as well.
> def is_symmetric(self):
>
+1 -- I agree 100% with David Roe's response.
On 6/28/07, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry I didn't reply earlier.
>
> Implementing an is_symmetric function for matrices sounds like a good idea.
> But I think it should go in the base class: something like
>
> def is_symmetric(self):
>
Sorry I didn't reply earlier.
Implementing an is_symmetric function for matrices sounds like a good idea.
But I think it should go in the base class: something like
def is_symmetric(self):
if self.ncols != self.nrows:
return False
cdef int i, j:
for i from 1 <= i < self.nrows: