Thank you for answers, and starting the ticket
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32899
to add a section on modularization in the sage developer manual.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece
On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 8:05:26 PM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Questions on "Features":
>
> We are introducing Features for packages in the sage library, like
> sage__combinat, sage__graphs, sage__plot, etc. How is this related with
> distributions? If a package is included in a distrib
Questions on "Features":
We are introducing Features for packages in the sage library, like
sage__combinat, sage__graphs, sage__plot, etc. How is this related with
distributions? If a package is included in a distribution (other than
sagemath-standard), a Feature for the package is introduced?
On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 5:37:13 PM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 2:59:55 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> ... So it would look like this:
>>
>
>> *sagemath-objects* < *sagemath-categories* < *sagemath-coding* <
>> *sagemath-standard-no-symbolics* < *sage
On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 2:59:55 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> ... So it would look like this:
>
> *sagemath-objects* < *sagemath-categories* < *sagemath-coding* <
> *sagemath-standard-no-symbolics* < *sagemath-standard*
>
>
package sage.coding needs linear algebra, all kinds of fields
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 11:48:04 PM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> For example, if there would be a distribution sagemath-coding that
>> contains sage/coding, then would we have this hierarchy
>>
>
> sagemath-objects < sagemath-categories < sagemath-standard-no-symbolics <
> ... < sagema
> Let me sketch my strategy to get closer to the design of other
> distributions. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29865 (waiting for
> review) introduces the two lowest levels - *sagemath-objects*,
> *sagemath-categories.* As soon as we have namespace packages working, the
> latter will depe
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 10:01:47 PM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 11:47:37 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> That would be https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29705
>
>
> Yes, all the information could be found in the ticket description and the
> descript
On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 11:47:37 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> That would be https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29705
Yes, all the information could be found in the ticket description and the
descriptions of the subtickets. But the master plan is buried in the
details. I want to
That would be https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29705
Help with documenting the principles and goals of modularization in the
developer's guide is definitely very welcome!
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 6:27:56 PM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sage modularization is going on, and I see
10 matches
Mail list logo
