[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-05-20 Thread mark mcclure
On May 20, 6:19 pm, Stephen Forrest wrote: > 2009/5/18 mark mcclure > > > Here are a couple of graph theoretic timing comparisons > > between Sage 4.0.alpha0 and Maple 13.  They were > > performed on my Macbook Pro running OSX 10.4.11. They > > indicate that Maple generates graphs a bit faster b

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-05-20 Thread Stephen Forrest
2009/5/18 mark mcclure > Here are a couple of graph theoretic timing comparisons > between Sage 4.0.alpha0 and Maple 13. They were > performed on my Macbook Pro running OSX 10.4.11. They > indicate that Maple generates graphs a bit faster but > Sage tests isomorphisms *much* faster. In neither

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-05-18 Thread mark mcclure
On Apr 28, 7:10 pm, William Stein wrote: > Maple13 was released today, I think.   > ... > Looking it over, the only overlap with Sage (current or in > development features) seems to be the following: >     * They now have graph isomorphism testing >     * They now have graph enumeration > ... >

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-29 Thread Tim Lahey
On Apr 30, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Roman Pearce wrote: > > On Apr 29, 4:39 pm, Franco Saliola wrote: >> I wonder if they fixed the 'numbpart' function. > > It looks like they did. I wonder every version if they've fixed integration of Heaviside functions. I know it's been broken for several version

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-29 Thread Roman Pearce
On Apr 29, 4:39 pm, Franco Saliola wrote: > I wonder if they fixed the 'numbpart' function. It looks like they did. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-uns

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-29 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:10 AM, William Stein wrote: > > Hi, > > Maple 13 was released today, I think.  The "new features" page is here: I wonder if they fixed the 'numbpart' function. This would affect my most favourite sequence in the OEIS: http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A11

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-29 Thread Tim Lahey
On Apr 29, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > In that case, I don't see why things should be limited to planar > graphs; > I can certainly draw lots of nonplanar graphs in a tool like you > describe. > > I guess we'll have to wait until someone gets a copy and lets us know > what this i

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-29 Thread Jason Grout
Tim Lahey wrote: > > On Apr 29, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Jason Grout wrote: >> >> Other graph things listed at >> http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/academic/math/graph_theory.aspx >> >> * calculate the plane dual graph -- I have code for this that we've >> been >> using in research.

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-29 Thread Tim Lahey
On Apr 29, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > > Other graph things listed at > http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/academic/math/graph_theory.aspx > > * calculate the plane dual graph -- I have code for this that we've > been > using in research. I just need to polish it

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-29 Thread Jason Grout
William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > Maple 13 was released today, I think. The "new features" page is here: > >http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/full_list.aspx > > Looking it over, the only overlap with Sage (current or in development > features) seems to be the following: >

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-28 Thread Roman Pearce
On Apr 28, 4:10 pm, William Stein wrote: > Maple 13 was released today, I think.  The "new features" page is here: >    http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/full_list.aspx > > Looking it over, the only overlap with Sage (current or in development > features) seems to be the follow

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-28 Thread Dan Drake
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 at 04:10PM -0700, William Stein wrote: > Maple 13 was released today, I think. The "new features" page is here: [...] > * The combinatorics package now includes the Eulerian numbers of > first and second order. [...] > I don't know anything about Eulerian numbers. def eule