Re: [sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

> I did already. Not every review is to the positive %-) This is not a review, this is trolling. Come on guy, the feature can be useful ! Don't kill it because of something else which is already done anyway ! Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

On Friday, June 6, 2014 1:44:13 PM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > P.S. : Still not feeling like reviewing #16353 ? :-PPP > I did already. Not every review is to the positive %-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe fro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

Yo ! > I agree. O_O God. This caught me off guard O_O > Still, even with your branch the text starts with "This is the reference manual". Well it better be since there is a big fat "Reference Manual" headline. I just pushed this : --- This is a thematic index of all of `Sage's

[sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

I agree. Still, even with your branch the text starts with "This is the reference manual". Well it better be since there is a big fat "Reference Manual" headline. How about we move the whole text into a separate "Foreword" menu item. On Friday, June 6, 2014 1:19:24 PM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen w

[sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

(when the branch is applied : http://www.steinertriples.fr/ncohen/tmp/a.jpg) Nathann On 6 June 2014 14:19, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello everybody ! > > I was looking at http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/ while preparing a > short introductive talk to Sage aaand I thought that t