On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:35:46 Simon King wrote:
> > It is a
> > bit of pity. sage-on-gentoo generates a bit of traffic on the
> > gentoo-science mailing list and the occasional thread here.
>
> sage-on-gentoo? Is that yet another list I haven't been aware of?
Just for clarification I work on portin
> +1 for disbanding sage-marketing and merging that with sage-devel. +1
> for disbanding sage-newbie (encourage sage-support instead) and merging
> sage-solaris with sage-devel, and maybe even merging sage-windows with
> sage-devel.
Note that sage-newbie was never a support list, but instead an
On 8/1/11 7:19 AM, Simon King wrote:
sage-newbie, sage-solaris, sage-flame, sage-marketing and sage-edu
together made up for 133 posts in six months. Moving all of it to sage-
devel would mean an increment of about 4%. If part of it was moved to
sage-support instead, the increment would be even l
Hi!
On 1 Aug., 15:18, kcrisman wrote:
> sage-marketing, and probably others, were proposed because people on
> sage-devel didn't necessarily want to be bothered with tons of details
> of that nature.
sage-newbie, sage-solaris, sage-flame, sage-marketing and sage-edu
together made up for 133 post
On Aug 1, 7:10 am, John Cremona wrote:
> Whenever I have suggested that a discussion move from sage-devel to
> sage-algebra or sage-nt, it has not been because I did not want to see
> it on sage-devel, but only because there are people who I thought
> would be interested and have something usefu
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:35:46 Simon King wrote:
> > It is a
> > bit of pity. sage-on-gentoo generates a bit of traffic on the
> > gentoo-science mailing list and the occasional thread here.
>
> sage-on-gentoo? Is that yet another list I haven't been aware of?
Just for clarification I work on portin
Whenever I have suggested that a discussion move from sage-devel to
sage-algebra or sage-nt, it has not been because I did not want to see
it on sage-devel, but only because there are people who I thought
would be interested and have something useful to say on the topic who
would probably not see i
Hi John,
On 1 Aug., 11:48, John Cremona wrote:
> > That's why I think that the attitude of banning certain subjects and
> > interning them into specialised lists is dangerous for Sage.
>
> I have never thought that certain subjects should in any way be
> "banned" from sage-devel or sage-support.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Francois and all,
>
> On 1 Aug., 05:52, Francois Bissey
> wrote:
>> In the case of sage-marketing, no impact what so ever since I had no clue
>> such a list existed.
>
> QED...
>
>> It is a
>> bit of pity. sage-on-gentoo generates a bit of t
Hi Francois and all,
On 1 Aug., 05:52, Francois Bissey
wrote:
> In the case of sage-marketing, no impact what so ever since I had no clue
> such a list existed.
QED...
> It is a
> bit of pity. sage-on-gentoo generates a bit of traffic on the gentoo-science
> mailing list and the occasional thre
> Hi Francois,
>
> On 31 Jul., 23:48, Francois Bissey
>
> wrote:
> > You forgot debian-sage
>
> Indeed. Sorry.
>
> Actually I attempted completeness; I did some searches, but debian-
> sage has not been found. It is another list that had no activity since
> Oct. 05, 2010.
>
> I hope you allow
Hi Francois,
On 31 Jul., 23:48, Francois Bissey
wrote:
> You forgot debian-sage
Indeed. Sorry.
Actually I attempted completeness; I did some searches, but debian-
sage has not been found. It is another list that had no activity since
Oct. 05, 2010.
I hope you allow a direct question: Did you h
12 matches
Mail list logo
