On 30 November 2012 15:53, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, November 30, 2012 6:36:32 AM UTC-5, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> It's clear there might be legal issues if Mathematica linked to Sage
>> using Mathlink, so I was thinking of sending the email below to both
>> the FSF and Wolfram Research
On 30 November 2012 17:35, Keshav Kini wrote:
> David Kirkby writes:
>> Sage
>>
>> http://www.sagemath.org/
>>
>> is an open-source mathematical package released under the GPL version
>> 2, or if the user wishes, any later version of the GPL.
>
> Well, according to William as of October 2011 in a
David Kirkby writes:
> Sage
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/
>
> is an open-source mathematical package released under the GPL version
> 2, or if the user wishes, any later version of the GPL.
Well, according to William as of October 2011 in an email to me:
> The complete Sage distribution is GPLv3
2012/11/30 kcrisman
> I guess I don't see the point. Are we really thinking Wolfram would want
> to do that?
I agree. Also, probably the FSF doesn't care a lot about this because
basically they exclude the possibility of existence of any nonfree
software...
--
*Andrea Lazzarotto* - http://an
On Friday, November 30, 2012 6:36:32 AM UTC-5, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> It's clear there might be legal issues if Mathematica linked to Sage
> using Mathlink, so I was thinking of sending the email below to both
> the FSF and Wolfram Research. Any comments?
>
>
I guess I don't see the point
