On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:14 PM, rjf wrote:
>
> There has been some discussion on sage-flame, but since it is
> continuing here, I
> would like to mention that Bjarke's comments, which seem to me to be
> quite constructive,
> have shown a substantial weakness in the computer systems design
> asp
There has been some discussion on sage-flame, but since it is
continuing here, I
would like to mention that Bjarke's comments, which seem to me to be
quite constructive,
have shown a substantial weakness in the computer systems design
aspects of Sage,
since so few people involved have a substantia
I wanted to spark a discussion about this because I have a perception
that it has not been discussed in a non-inflammatory way, and talking
about it in a non-inflammatory way might have people come up with
ideas where otherwise they wouldn't think about it. This has been a
valuable experience for
> But as much as I know, it is highly encouraged (and AFAIK
> quite common) that people post at sage-devel or sage-combinat before
> they work on a big project or if a high-level strategic decision is to
> be made. It appears reasonable to me that this "doing things in
> public" is a good (perhaps
Hi Bjarke!
On 20 Sep., 14:51, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune
wrote:
> > In that case, could you explain what you did intend, since evidently I
> > completely misunderstood you. Are you proposing creating wiki
> > pages, or a survey paper, or a directory of experts or?
>
> Benefiting from experience
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune
wrote:
>
>> In that case, could you explain what you did intend, since evidently I
>> completely misunderstood you. Are you proposing creating wiki
>> pages, or a survey paper, or a directory of experts or?
>>
> Benefiting from experien
> In that case, could you explain what you did intend, since evidently I
> completely misunderstood you.Are you proposing creating wiki
> pages, or a survey paper, or a directory of experts or?
>
Benefiting from experience is good. From using the search, the topic
of how to do that more has no
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune
wrote:
>
>> Your disguising a dubious claim in the form of a question: Since Sage
>> developers just do the first thing that pops into their head, how can
>> we find a way to fix this problem? However, implicit in the question
>> is the
> Your disguising a dubious claim in the form of a question: Since Sage
> developers just do the first thing that pops into their head, how can
> we find a way to fix this problem? However, implicit in the question
> is the assertion that people who implement code for Sage often do the
> "first
On Sep 19, 2009, at 10:08 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune
> wrote:
>>
>> People have been writing mathematics software for a long time and so
>> people have been accumulating experiences about good ways and bad
>> ways
>> to do things. I'm won
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune
wrote:
>
> People have been writing mathematics software for a long time and so
> people have been accumulating experiences about good ways and bad ways
> to do things. I'm wondering how much Sage development is informed by
> that experien
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune
wrote:
>
> People have been writing mathematics software for a long time and so
> people have been accumulating experiences about good ways and bad ways
> to do things. I'm wondering how much Sage development is informed by
> that experien
12 matches
Mail list logo
