Yes, you just need to change it back to "need review" so that it can be
reviewed.
Le mercredi 13 avril 2022 à 03:54:33 UTC-4, adarsh.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
> Can I make these changes in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33688 as
> discussed? The ticket has not been closed yet
>
> On Wednesday,
By the way, I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33703 after a
discussion on https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/R3r3G_Qrllo.
If I am successful, we will test it to see if there are any performance
improvements over the sequential version, else we can remove that line.
Is that fine?
On
Can I make these changes in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33688 as
discussed? The ticket has not been closed yet
On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 12:44:36 PM UTC+5:30 David Coudert wrote:
> You are right, this can be removed too.
> And I'm not sure a parallel version of Boruvka's algorithm is
You are right, this can be removed too.
And I'm not sure a parallel version of Boruvka's algorithm is needed. We
already have a large number of spanning tree algorithms.
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:56:20 PM UTC+2 patrat...@gmail.com wrote:
> Just wondering if the third TODO (Randomized span
Just wondering if the third TODO (Randomized spanning tree construction)
should be removed as well, since I see a function called "random_spanning_tree"
exists already.
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 8:23:30 AM UTC+1 adarsh.k...@gmail.com wrote:
> Okay, then I think that line should be removed rig
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33688
I have done the change
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 12:20:19 PM UTC+5:30 David Coudert wrote:
> Sure, feel free to open a ticket to correct this.
>
> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:18:38 PM UTC+2 adarsh.k...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I can open a ticket to corr
Sure, feel free to open a ticket to correct this.
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:18:38 PM UTC+2 adarsh.k...@gmail.com wrote:
> I can open a ticket to correct this if you want
>
> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:53:30 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
>
>> Okay, then I think that line should be re
I can open a ticket to correct this if you want
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:53:30 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
> Okay, then I think that line should be removed right? It can be misleading
> to potential contributors
>
> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:31:02 PM UTC+5:30 David Coudert wro
Okay, then I think that line should be removed right? It can be misleading
to potential contributors
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:31:02 PM UTC+5:30 David Coudert wrote:
> This query has been added in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10433.
> I don't think that priority queue can be of any hel
This query has been added in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10433.
I don't think that priority queue can be of any help to speed up the
current code.
On Sunday, April 10, 2022 at 11:03:41 AM UTC+2 adarsh.k...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was going through Sage's codebase, and I came a
10 matches
Mail list logo
