On 17 Apr., 23:25, François Bissey
wrote:
> They are essentially the same type. In sage-on-gentoo we actually did a small
> patch to zn_poly because ulong is defined in both flint and zn_poly and it
> gave
> rise to problems. Essentially it boils to this:
> -typedef unsigned long ulong;
> +#ifnd
That would be great.
David
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 13:27, leif wrote:
> On 17 Apr., 23:30, David Roe wrote:
> > Patching zn_poly in Sage sounds good to me
>
> I could include such a patch into the zn_poly spkg at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12433
>
>
> -leif
>
> > On Tue,
On 18 Apr., 00:44, Bill Hart wrote:
> At the present moment flint 2.3 does not use zn_poly.
zn_poly's 'configure' has some '--use-flint' option, but we currently
don't use that either.
-leif
> We may be incorporating some code from zn_poly in flint 2.3 in the
> future, but will not need to hav
On 17 Apr., 23:30, David Roe wrote:
> Patching zn_poly in Sage sounds good to me
I could include such a patch into the zn_poly spkg at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12433
-leif
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 17:25, François Bissey
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:56:52 David R
At the present moment flint 2.3 does not use zn_poly.
We may be incorporating some code from zn_poly in flint 2.3 in the
future, but will not need to have a dependence on zn_poly proper.
Bill.
On Apr 17, 10:30 pm, David Roe wrote:
> Patching zn_poly in Sage sounds good to me
>
> Does anyone
