On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 10:40:39 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 12:12:33 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik
> wrote:
>>
>> Still, why don't we start by including this code as an experimental
>> package?
>>
>
>
> Thats fine, but the way I understood Kiran
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 12:12:33 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Still, why don't we start by including this code as an experimental
> package?
>
Thats fine, but the way I understood Kiran he wants to make it standard.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On 20 September 2017 at 07:58, Volker Braun wrote:
> IMHO its a code smell if your code doesn't work on 32-bit platforms.
> Remember, almost all 32 bit platforms are perfectly capable of working with
> 64-bit integers (just not as fast). But your code must be *correct* (e.g.
> use uint64_t), and
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 7:58:34 AM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> IMHO its a code smell if your code doesn't work on 32-bit platforms.
> Remember, almost all 32 bit platforms are perfectly capable of working with
> 64-bit integers (just not as fast). But your code must be *correct*
IMHO its a code smell if your code doesn't work on 32-bit platforms.
Remember, almost all 32 bit platforms are perfectly capable of working with
64-bit integers (just not as fast). But your code must be *correct* (e.g.
use uint64_t), and not just coincidentally work on some compiler/platform
bu
