Thanks, Dima!
I have done so. I've also added a feature, a bugfix for it, and a
doctest for it. Here is the new patch:
http://www1.spms.ntu.edu.sg/~krkini/temp/sage-wlrefine.patch
Same URL, new file. If you would like to see the old patch, stick a
".old" on the end of the URL. Is this patch abou
v2 or later.
and yes, Sage code should also go under v2 or later.
On Dec 15, 10:24 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 12/15/10 3:09 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 10:10 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >> certainly, I can relicense whatever was under v3 to v2, if needed.
>
> > the original i
On 12/15/10 3:09 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Dec 14, 10:10 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
certainly, I can relicense whatever was under v3 to v2, if needed.
the original is now under GPLv2.
So you can go ahead and put your code under v2, as well.
GPLv2, or GPLv2+ (version 2 or later)? It wou
On Dec 14, 10:10 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> certainly, I can relicense whatever was under v3 to v2, if needed.
the original is now under GPLv2.
So you can go ahead and put your code under v2, as well.
Dima
>
> On Dec 14, 10:00 pm, Keshav Kini wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi Minh,
>
> > On Dec 14
certainly, I can relicense whatever was under v3 to v2, if needed.
Dima
On Dec 14, 10:00 pm, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Hi Minh,
>
> On Dec 14, 9:07 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > [...]
> > Your patch adds the following source files to the Sage library:
>
> > * STABIL.c
> > * STABIL.h
>
> > both
Hi Minh,
On Dec 14, 9:07 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> [...]
> Your patch adds the following source files to the Sage library:
>
> * STABIL.c
> * STABIL.h
>
> both of which are explicitly licensed under the terms of GPLv3. A
> policy of the Sage project is to include only code licensed under the
> ter
