Hello,
After more than 5 years, there is now a ticket implementing a unit_group()
method for IntegerModRing: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17317 (needs
review).
Peter
Op zaterdag 19 september 2009 05:14:57 UTC+2 schreef Rob Beezer:
>
> Sage-Devel,
>
> I've got it in my head to implement th
On Sep 21, 11:50 am, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Hi Karl-Dieter,
>
> Well, I guess I *am* doing this as I put together something very quick
> and sloppy last night, which has helped formulate my ideas for a
> better version (this approach was due to some good advice from
> William). Let me know if you
Hi Karl-Dieter,
Well, I guess I *am* doing this as I put together something very quick
and sloppy last night, which has helped formulate my ideas for a
better version (this approach was due to some good advice from
William). Let me know if you need something messy and incomplete, but
serviceable
Rob,
Please do this! I am always having to do some hack in my number
theory class for this, and it is very annoying (as you have
discovered) not to have this. It is somewhere very far down my to-do
list for Sage. Actually, I'm surprised there isn't some hidden
structure where it lurks, as you
Francis,
On Sep 19, 2:12 am, fwc wrote:
> I have a draft of an implementation of the group of units for a finite
> field, which overlaps, of course, with the group in question. I
> modelled it on John Cremona's unit group code for number fields (sage/
> rings/number_field/unit_group.py).
Thank
On Sep 19, 4:14 am, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Has this group been implemented somewhere and I missed it? Is there
> some other powerful machinery for rings that might make this easier to
> implement? Any code elsewhere for a similar structure or purpose that
> I might look to for help in designing
