I know this thread is a bit outdated, but I had problems to compile
Atlas in an experiment
and wanted to ask if anybody has tried to use GotoBlas instead of
Atlas in the meantime?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
I also can't build atlas on my (fairly) new but low-powered portable.
So, I second that (although I admit I don't understand what all the
issues are that might be involved.)
-Mike
On 12/10/2010 09:50:06 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
on a 4-years old x86 laptop I have, I usually just cannot build At
on a 4-years old x86 laptop I have, I usually just cannot build Atlas
in Sage. It fails, as it's
unable to perform their (in)famous tuning precisely enough.
A replacement for Atlas would be nice, therefore...
On Dec 10, 9:21 am, Bill Hart wrote:
> So I don't know what is considered a fast time
-Original Message-
From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com on behalf of Bill Hart
Sent: Fri 12/10/2010 2:21 PM
To: sage-devel
Subject: [sage-devel] Re: Goto Blas.
So I don't know what is considered a fast time to build BLAS, but on
my machine it was straightforward. I just typed make a
So I don't know what is considered a fast time to build BLAS, but on
my machine it was straightforward. I just typed make and it detected
the number of cores, the architecture and built a multithreaded BLAS
and LAPACK (which it automatically downloaded for me). It took about
90s to build and automa
On Dec 10, 12:39 am, Bill Hart wrote:
> This is *fantastic* news that GotoBlas has been BSD licensed. I've
> wanted to use it in FLINT for years, and we've just been discussing
> highly optimised matrix routines (Fredrik Johansson has been writing
> lots of code too).
>
> But I am slightly confu
This is *fantastic* news that GotoBlas has been BSD licensed. I've
wanted to use it in FLINT for years, and we've just been discussing
highly optimised matrix routines (Fredrik Johansson has been writing
lots of code too).
But I am slightly confused over the CBLAS interface thing.
It seems that t
Seems like I didn't dig deep enough.
So it isn't actively developed by the TACC
anymore, it is given to the community to
maintain and take over development.
It only provides f77blas. I guess it would
be possible to create a cblas interface using
f2c but it is not really something anyone would
wan
-Original Message-
From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com on behalf of Jason Grout
Sent: Wed 12/8/2010 2:19 AM
To: sage-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sage-devel] Re: Goto Blas.
On 12/7/10 12:05 AM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
> The Goto Blas are now under BSD license.
>
Le 07/12/2010 14:22, Jason Grout a écrit :
On 12/7/10 12:05 AM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
The Goto Blas are now under BSD license.
http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/gotoblas2/
This could be a replacement for Atlas (these blas are supposed to be
faster).
According to the developer's wikipe
On 12/7/10 12:05 AM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
The Goto Blas are now under BSD license.
http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/gotoblas2/
This could be a replacement for Atlas (these blas are supposed to be
faster).
According to the developer's wikipedia page [1], Kazushige Gotō joined
Microso
On 12/7/10 12:05 AM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
The Goto Blas are now under BSD license.
http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/gotoblas2/
This could be a replacement for Atlas (these blas are supposed to be
faster).
How active is the project? The second sentence in the above page is:
"This pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
