[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-23 Thread mmarco
I think it would make more sense to wrap qepcad than to rewrite its functionality from scratch. Of course, SymPy doesn't follow the same approach as Sage, so i guess for them it makes sense to reinvent the wheel. El lunes, 23 de febrero de 2015, 17:13:38 (UTC+1), robert.pollak escribió: > > Am

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-23 Thread Robert Pollak
Am 13.02.2015 um 17:04 schrieb mmarco: > Apperently there have been some movement on that aspect on sympy too: Yes, but unfortunately no GSoC students worked on this. They also have no CAD yet, see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2015-Ideas#cylindrical-algebraic-decomposition . -- Yo

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-20 Thread Harald Schilly
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 5:03:45 AM UTC+1, William wrote: > > Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to ... > > Short update: Today is the proposal submission deadline. We are already set up for this. What still needs a little bit of further attention is the wiki page for projec

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-13 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 5:03:45 AM UTC+1, William wrote: > > Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015 I wanted to add this link to the wiki page: http://trac.sagemath.org/query?status=needs_info&status=needs_work&status=new&milestone=sa

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-13 Thread mmarco
I saw it on Dima's webpage http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/teaching/studentprojects/357.html But i don't know if it was actually proposed officially. Apperently there have been some movement on that aspect on sympy too: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2012-Application-Prateek-Papriwal:-Cylindri

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-13 Thread Robert Pollak
Am 11.02.2015 um 13:52 schrieb mmarco: > IIRC there was an old proposal about implementing semialgebraic sets. Hello Miguel, can you point me to this old proposal? I could not find it in the list archive and on the wiki. Robert -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-13 Thread Robert Pollak
Am 12.02.2015 um 15:08 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> "Add support for systems of rational inequalities". [...] > There was a mentioning of a bigger thing - computing with semialgebraic > sets, and then this topic would naturally become a part of such a project. Yes, my univariate case would fit into

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2015-02-12, Robert Pollak wrote: > Am 11.02.2015 um 05:03 schrieb William Stein: >> Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to >> >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015 > > I hope it is suitable that I have added something there: > "Add support for systems of rational inequalities". it's

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-12 Thread Robert Pollak
Am 11.02.2015 um 05:03 schrieb William Stein: > Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015 I hope it is suitable that I have added something there: "Add support for systems of rational inequalities". BTW, is there a way to get notified per mail when

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-11 Thread Vincent Knight
Dima pointed this out to me the other day but I haven't had time to add anything to it. I'm hoping to get to it this evening with an idea of adding a Game theory project :) Thanks, Vince On Wed Feb 11 2015 at 12:52:32 PM mmarco wrote: > IIRC there was an old proposal about implementing semialge

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-11 Thread mmarco
IIRC there was an old proposal about implementing semialgebraic sets. It would be nice to retake it. QEPCAD could be used to do much of the heavylifting computations. I know a PhD student that plans to finish his thesis this year and works on related concepts, i can ask him about his availabili

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2015-02-11 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2015-02-11, William Stein wrote: > Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015 > > There were basically zero that involved actual mathematics, so I've > added two. One is relevant for quaternion algebras and another for > modular forms. > > Hey peop

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2014-01-30 Thread Stefan
I'd be happy to mentor a project regarding sage.matroids. Last year's participant on my project canceled at the last minute, so I hope to have better luck this year! I'll update the project description as soon as the document goes up. --Stefan. On Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:18:42 AM UTC-5, B

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2014-01-30 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-01-30 14:54, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: PARI 2.6.2 which should be an RC for PARI 2.7 should be out real soon, at least that's what was announced at the latest PARI workshop a few weeks ago, so we could begin packaging it. I created http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15767 for this. -- You r

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2014-01-30 Thread Harald Schilly
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > Not sure what would better fit directly within Sage and in C libraries, > let's say FLINT. In general, based on the experience from the last years: If such a FLINT or Pari related project is of interest (i.e. there is at least one mentor

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2014-01-30 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:44:10 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: > > 1. We use pari's SEA for elliptic curves over prime fields. the next > version of pari, 2.7, is supposed to have point-counting over > non-prime fields. > Yes for elliptic curves PARI 2.7 will have SEA over non-prime fiel

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2014-01-30 Thread John Cremona
1. We use pari's SEA for elliptic curves over prime fields. the next version of pari, 2.7, is supposed to have point-counting over non-prime fields. 2. There is also very good code out there for hyperelliptics, I think by Sutherland. Do you need more general curves than that? John On 30 January

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2014-01-30 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
I'd like to have better point counting on curves over finite fields in Sage. Not sure what would better fit directly within Sage and in C libraries, let's say FLINT. Not sure I can mentor someone, I'll gather some info about that. On Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:45:18 PM UTC+1, mmarco wrote: > >

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2014-01-30 Thread mmarco
I am tempted to make a poll bewteen the math instructors/researchers asking them what would they like to be improved in sage, and use that information for a project proposal. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from t

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2014-01-30 Thread Harald Schilly
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote: > If there is > interest we should copy that document and start updating the project > descriptions. Hi, thanks for posting this, I'll start working on the Sage application today. And yes, the most important aspect are project proposals and p

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

2014-01-30 Thread mmarco
I would like to mentor some projects this year again. The virtual machine GUI sounds like a good fit. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+