Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Hi Dima, We can still add projects. We can add projects up until the student submission deadline. However, for us to be accepted as a mentor org, we need sufficiently many new project ideas. Can you add this to the wiki page? Best, Travis On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 8:47:12 AM UTC+9 dim.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 09:29:35AM -0800, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: > That would be awesome! Maybe it is not completely impossible to find a > suitable Lisp student, if we advertise it in the right places? well, we can add a project, still, not too late? explore and implement Python/Pyth

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

That would be awesome! Maybe it is not completely impossible to find a suitable Lisp student, if we advertise it in the right places? Martin On Thursday, 20 February 2025 at 02:56:52 UTC+1 dim...@gmail.com wrote: On 19 February 2025 09:25:12 GMT-06:00, 'Martin R' via sage-devel < sage-...@go

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

On 19 February 2025 09:25:12 GMT-06:00, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: >I would like to remark that, as far as I know, the guessing facilities of >gfun have a reasonable replacement which is available in sage through >fricas. The last time I checked, this was more general and at least as

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

I couldn't find a way to register to this wiki, so could someone please update the page with the following info? Thanks! (Maybe for next time use https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki) Project: Lie group actions on manifolds Mentor: Tobias Diez, Erik? Area: Differential Geometry Skills: Knowl

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Thanks Martin for the suggestion. I think it would be nice to improve the fricas interface as part of the project! (hint: you can help with mentoring). On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 16:25, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: > > I would like to remark that, as far as I know, the guessing facilities of > g

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

I would like to remark that, as far as I know, the guessing facilities of gfun have a reasonable replacement which is available in sage through fricas. The last time I checked, this was more general and at least as fast than it's maple counterpart. The one thing that would dramatically improve

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Additionally, I would like to propose that "SageMath subprojects" (such as ore_algebra, admcycles, sage-flatsurf, slabbe, ...) could make GSOC proposal under the SageMath umbrella. I believe it is easier for a newcomer to be able to contribute to a smaller standalone project. What do you thin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Hi Vincent^2, Thank you for the ideas and adding them to the ideas page. Best, Travis On Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 12:18:29 AM UTC+9 Vincent Neiger wrote: > Hello, > > I just added to the wiki the two projects suggested above. Could you > please have a look to make sure I did not intro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Hello, I just added to the wiki the two projects suggested above. Could you please have a look to make sure I did not introduce any typo and such? In particular for the second project, as I created some title and I changed "genfun" into "gfun" which seems to be the usual name for the Maple libr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Additionally, I would like to propose that "SageMath subprojects" (such as ore_algebra, admcycles, sage-flatsurf, slabbe, ...) could make GSOC proposal under the SageMath umbrella. I believe it is easier for a newcomer to be able to contribute to a smaller standalone project. What do you think? On

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

I lost my wiki password but I am willing to propose to mentor on the following topics. I would welcome in anyone assisting me in the mentoring. 1) Zariski closures of finitely generated matrix groups Mentor: Vincent Delecroix + (?) Area: Algebra Skills: Group theory, Lie algebras, Number fields,

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Hi everyone, It would be good if people added more project ideas and/or be willing to be listed as a mentor. Google is looking more closely at what mentor orgs are putting in their ideas pages, and right now it looks like we do not have many mentors this year. It would be great to improve thi

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Thanks, I've added you as a potential mentor there. Best, Travis On Thursday, February 6, 2025 at 7:04:19 PM UTC+9 axio...@yahoo.de wrote: > I'd be happy to co-mentor the diagram algebra project (where I know a > little bit of the mathematics), and also the free module project. > > Martin > On

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Thanks Travis for setting that up again! On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 11:04, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: > > I'd be happy to co-mentor the diagram algebra project (where I know a little > bit of the mathematics), and also the free module project. > > Martin > On Thursday, 6 February 2025 at 00:38:

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

I'd be happy to co-mentor the diagram algebra project (where I know a little bit of the mathematics), and also the free module project. Martin On Thursday, 6 February 2025 at 00:38:30 UTC+1 tcsc...@gmail.com wrote: > Some other points I should mention: > > - Google will probably start looking at

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

Some other points I should mention: - Google will probably start looking at proposals after Feb. 11, so it would be good to have the projects listed before then. However, this is not a hard deadline and you are welcome to add project ideas at any time. - If you are not able to edit the wiki page

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2021 - Introduction - BTerms project

Hi Thomas and David, Nice to meet you. I'm also participating in GSoC this summer. Looking forward to seeing everything that comes out of this summer! Best, Trevor On Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 10:19:07 AM UTC-5 davida...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello Thomas! > > I'm also participating in GSoC this s

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2021 - Introduction - BTerms project

Hello Thomas! I'm also participating in GSoC this summer. If you need help with any mathematical stuff you can ask me, I'll be glad to help you. I'm looking forward to learn more about your project. Best, David A. Le lundi 7 juin 2021 à 09:11:28 UTC-4, Thomas Hagelmayer a écrit : > Hello ev

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

I am going to take up being the admin for GSoC this year. So I am getting the application prepared. I will post a separate thread calling for project ideas. Best, Travis On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 5:49:55 AM UTC+10 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > being an admin is relatively little work. > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

being an admin is relatively little work. Perhaps we can indeed skip this year, in particular as the GSoC format got changed so that the projects are to be considerably shorter, stipends smaller too, high school leavers became eligible, etc. (so more PR for Goog, less substance, I think) https:

[sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

Sounds like Travis is asking if a previous admin would be willing to be the mentor for new admins. Perhaps if we have a mentoring program for new admins, we will be able to recruit more admins. On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 12:22:36 AM UTC-8 Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > I think I could prob

[sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

I think I could probably manage being part of the admin, but I definitely could not do it alone without someone who knows more about how it works. Best, Travis On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 11:46:55 PM UTC+10 David Coudert wrote: > This year is difficult for all of us and we lack motivation

[sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

This year is difficult for all of us and we lack motivation for this edition of GSoC. On the other end, it is more important than ever to push/motivate/help students. Other Sagemath contributors than the usual could be involved in mentoring activity. I think many contributors are not really awa

[sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

I have participated as mentor other years... but this year I just don't think I have the needed energy. I think Harald's proposal to pass this year and reconsider the next one makes sense (sadly). El domingo, 7 de febrero de 2021 a las 17:54:07 UTC+1, harald@gmail.com escribió: > Hi, a wor

[sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

Hi, a word from my side: I would really like to stop being admin as well and hope someone else can take over. I'm the one writing the application each year and I could this time around, but in general I want to focus on other things after all those years. Despite that, looks like there are only

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

I'll be happy to mentor a good student, but would prefer not to be admin. I already have a huge load of administrative work daily and would appreciate not to have extra. Le jeudi 4 février 2021 à 15:21:06 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:32 AM 'Travis Scrimshaw' via s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:32 AM 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel wrote: > > I am happy to mentor, but I am not sure I could take on being an admin this > year (next year I could though). admin is much less work than mentoring, I think. > > Best, > Travis > > > On Tuesday, February 2, 2021 at 7:

[sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

I am happy to mentor, but I am not sure I could take on being an admin this year (next year I could though). Best, Travis On Tuesday, February 2, 2021 at 7:54:01 PM UTC+10 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear all, > > we are looking for projects and mentors for GSoC 2021. > > Myself, I'll pass this

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2019?

Just FYI: I'll write an application and invite anyone who is interested to it. I've also started the page for project ideas: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2019 -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this gro

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2019?

Maybe I could mentor a student, but don't have in mind any specific project proposal right now. WIll think about it. El martes, 15 de enero de 2019, 21:28:16 (UTC+1), Harald Schilly escribió: > > Hi everyone. This years Google Summer of Code 2019 just started. Should we > write an application? W

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2019?

Please start on the application, I'll help as much as I can. I probably could only mentor 1 student this year - but I am happy to be a GSoC admin. Dima On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:02 PM David Coudert wrote: > > I'm ready to help mentoring and writing the application. > > Le mardi 15 janvier 2019 2

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2019?

I'm ready to help mentoring and writing the application. Le mardi 15 janvier 2019 21:28:16 UTC+1, Harald Schilly a écrit : > > Hi everyone. This years Google Summer of Code 2019 just started. Should we > write an application? Who is motivated to be a mentor? Everyone from last > year still on bo

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2019?

I am willing to be a mentor and to help with writing an application. Best, Travis On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 6:28:16 AM UTC+10, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hi everyone. This years Google Summer of Code 2019 just started. Should we > write an application? Who is motivated to be a mentor? Ev

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

Hi, Add me as well! On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 4:33:14 PM UTC+5:30, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hello everyone. This year's Google Summer of Code started again. Are > we applying again? Who wants to be a mentor for a student? First step > is to get the application done and fill in this pag

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

Count me in as well. On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 4:33:14 PM UTC+5:30, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hello everyone. This year's Google Summer of Code started again. Are > we applying again? Who wants to be a mentor for a student? First step > is to get the application done and fill in this page

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

I'm for sure too late, but an interesting contribution would be to extend the MIP backend to enable column generation. I don't know how to do it, and I remember that Nathann told me once that it might be difficult to do. David. Le lundi 22 janvier 2018 14:03:30 UTC+1, Stefan a écrit : > > We h

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

We have two project suggestions so far. Any others? The deadline for SageMath to submit its application is tomorrow morning! —Stefan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

Hello, thank you for everyone's interest. There are a few who are willing to mentor again, but we also need short outlines of potential summer projects. So far, there is just one here: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2018 for comparison, and maybe also as a source of inspiration, last year is h

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 4:54:19 AM UTC-6, Harald Schilly wrote: > > > On Friday, January 12, 2018 at 6:26:02 PM UTC+1, Stefan wrote: >> >> Please register me as mentor again. >>> >>> >>> > Hi, thank you for the responses. Before I can add anyone sage as an > organization needs to be sel

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

On Friday, January 12, 2018 at 6:26:02 PM UTC+1, Stefan wrote: > > Please register me as mentor again. >> >> >> Hi, thank you for the responses. Before I can add anyone sage as an organization needs to be selected, though. So, let's hope the application goes through again. I'll keep everyone pos

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

Please register me as mentor again. On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 5:03:14 AM UTC-6, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hello everyone. This year's Google Summer of Code started again. Are > we applying again? Who wants to be a mentor for a student? First step > is to get the application done and fill in

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

Same for me. Thank you. On Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 11:55:59 AM UTC-6, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Hi Harald, > certainly we should apply again. > Please register me as a mentor. > Thanks! > > On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 11:03:14 AM UTC, Harald Schilly wrote: >> >> Hello everyone. This year'

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

Hi Harald, certainly we should apply again. Please register me as a mentor. Thanks! On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 11:03:14 AM UTC, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hello everyone. This year's Google Summer of Code started again. Are > we applying again? Who wants to be a mentor for a student? First ste

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

yes, no problem, invite is sent On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde wrote: > Hi Harald, > > Sorry I've been unresponsive for a while. I realise I'm not on the > mentors list to review projects - could you please add me? > > Probably best to use this email address: santaph...@gm

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

Hi Harald, Sorry I've been unresponsive for a while. I realise I'm not on the mentors list to review projects - could you please add me? Probably best to use this email address: santaph...@gmail.com Best, Johan Rosenkilde Harald Schilly writes: > Hi, a follow up for mentors: I thought mentors

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

Be aware that this is not the mentor list, but the public list. Please don't discuss content of the submitted proposals here. -- Stefan On Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 6:25:45 AM UTC-5, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > Thanks Harald. > I did not realize so many of them were for my project. > I only s

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

Thanks Harald. I did not realize so many of them were for my project. I only saw one and it was junk. I'll check the other ones but have little hope. Hopefully other mentors will be much luckier! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. T

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

Update: There are 29 proposals, some of them are junk, but I think there are also good ones. If you can, please help reviewing them. We have until April 24th. https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline -- harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

Hi, a follow up for mentors: I thought mentors can ask to register, but no, please contact me to be invited (and if not clear, tell me which email address) There is also a little bit of activity here: https://groups.google.com/group/sage-gsoc/ -- harald -- You received this message because you

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

I have an idea for a project but no time this year for mentoring (maybe next one) The idea boils down to develop a random testing framework to find (in some way minimal) failing examples (wrong answers or crashes) using bots (like running patchbot to test sage). So if someone is willing, able

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 11:03:57 AM UTC, David Coudert wrote: > > That's clearly something we need. > If the student is good and fast, (s)he can also try to implement the > split-decomposition which is a generalization of modular decomposition that > can be computed in linear time (ro

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

That's clearly something we need. If the student is good and fast, (s)he can also try to implement the split-decomposition which is a generalization of modular decomposition that can be computed in linear time (roughly finds complete bipartite graph separators). Also, we could consider adding e

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 11:13:40 PM UTC+1, mmarco wrote: > > I don't plan to have much time available to mentor, but I think the > project of porting rubi to sage would be doable. Someone wants to step in > as a co-mentor? > No GSoC commitment from me but a support statement. -- You re

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

I've added a project on modular decomposition of graphs and digraphs. How many more we would like to have? On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 6:05:19 PM UTC, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hello, this year's Google Summer of Code 2017 just started. > > I assume we will try again to be part of it, and t

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 9:33:22 AM UTC-6, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > I added two projects with the somewhat broad subject areas: > > - Improve the representation theory in Sage > - Improve the root system code in Sage > > I added another one for quantum cluster algebras (based on a sugge

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

I added two projects with the somewhat broad subject areas: - Improve the representation theory in Sage - Improve the root system code in Sage -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving email

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

I can add (and volunteer to mentor) a project to develop an implementation of graph modular decomposition (which is very broken in Sage, and no 3rd party implementations are suitable for interfacing) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" gro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

Hi Harald, Thanks for yelling out. I've added the polynomial class project that I mentioned on the list earlier. But 1 project is surely not enough... Best, Johan Harald Schilly writes: > Hello, in 3 days is the deadline regarding the project application. > I'm working on the application itself

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

Hello, in 3 days is the deadline regarding the project application. I'm working on the application itself, but a list of suggested projects is *vital* to getting approval. I saw a few ideas here, but so far not a single proposal was added to https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2017 Please compare it w

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 8:40:06 PM UTC+1, mmarco wrote: > > I am not sure I will have time to be a mentor this year, but I would like > to propose porting rubi to sage: > The main tasks would be: 1. implement missing symbolic functions (Meijer-G, Appell, etc.) 2. convert the ruleset to an

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

I am not sure I will have time to be a mentor this year, but I would like to propose porting rubi to sage: http://www.apmaths.uwo.ca/~arich/ It is a series of rules (over 6000) to be applied to symbolic expressions in order to get their primitive. The results they produce are better than the M

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2016 project on algebraic curves

> > > > I don't yet have a blog but will create one soon. I will post a link here > when it is up and will use it to document the project progress. My Sage > experience so far has mostly been with the arithmetic dynamics > functionality and progress in that area is managed within a page of the

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2016 project on algebraic curves

Thanks! I really appreciate you taking the time to mentor this project! I don't yet have a blog but will create one soon. I will post a link here when it is up and will use it to document the project progress. My Sage experience so far has mostly been with the arithmetic dynamics functionality

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2016 project on algebraic curves

Welcome! Now we have a couple of weeks for "community bonding" before you actually start working in the project. I guess that means this is the time where you get used to Sage development workflow: the trac server, review process, discussions in this mailing lists and so on. Since you have alre

[sage-devel] Re: GSoc 2016 - Hyperplane Arrangements

On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:23:17 UTC+5:30, mmarco wrote: > > Can you enumerate the functionalities in Macaulay2 that could be added to > Sage? > > Apart from functionalities mentioned by Jayamine I found following implementations not present in Sage 1) Euler characteristics of Affine subspa

[sage-devel] Re: GSoc 2016 - Hyperplane Arrangements

Hi, I'm also interested at this project. On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:23:17 PM UTC+5:30, mmarco wrote: > > Can you enumerate the functionalities in Macaulay2 that could be added to > Sage? > I roughly went through 1) Hyperplane Arrangement sage 2) Hyperplane Arrangement Macaulay2

[sage-devel] Re: GSoc 2016 - Hyperplane Arrangements

Can you enumerate the functionalities in Macaulay2 that could be added to Sage? El martes, 1 de marzo de 2016, 17:44:24 (UTC+1), AKSHAY AJAGEKAR escribió: > > Hi, > I am Akshay Ajagekar, currently an undergrad at the Indian Institute of > Technology. > I have been exploring Sage for a few weeks

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015: 5 projects funded

I'm adding my thanks to Harald. To the students: good luck, and have fun! On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 10:40:12 AM UTC-5, david@inria.fr wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 6:43:32 AM UTC+2, Vincent Knight wrote: >> >> Thanks for the hard work Harald and welcome to all the students!

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015: 5 projects funded

On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 6:43:32 AM UTC+2, Vincent Knight wrote: > > Thanks for the hard work Harald and welcome to all the students! > +1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015: 5 projects funded

> Thanks, Harald, > for the work making this possible. > >> >> +1! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015: 5 projects funded

Thanks for giving me the opportunity to work on this project. Kind Regards, Tobenna Peter, Igwe On Monday, 27 April 2015 21:07:46 UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hello students and welcome to SageMath! This years GSoC funds five > projects: > > (Multivariate) Asymptotic Expressions > Benjamin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015: 5 projects funded

Thanks for the hard work Harald and welcome to all the students! Vince On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:58 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Thanks, Harald, > for the work making this possible. > > > On Monday, 27 April 2015 21:07:46 UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote: >> >> Hello students and welcome to SageMath! This y

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015: 5 projects funded

Thanks, Harald, for the work making this possible. On Monday, 27 April 2015 21:07:46 UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hello students and welcome to SageMath! This years GSoC funds five > projects: > > (Multivariate) Asymptotic Expressions > Benjamin Hackl and Daniel Krenn > > http://www.googl

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015: 5 projects funded

Thank you very much for the opportunity! I'm looking forward to working on my project! :-) Best wishes, Benjamin Am Montag, 27. April 2015 22:07:46 UTC+2 schrieb Harald Schilly: > > Hello students and welcome to SageMath! This years GSoC funds five > projects: > > (Multivariate) Asymptotic Ex

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

I think it would make more sense to wrap qepcad than to rewrite its functionality from scratch. Of course, SymPy doesn't follow the same approach as Sage, so i guess for them it makes sense to reinvent the wheel. El lunes, 23 de febrero de 2015, 17:13:38 (UTC+1), robert.pollak escribió: > > Am

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

Am 13.02.2015 um 17:04 schrieb mmarco: > Apperently there have been some movement on that aspect on sympy too: Yes, but unfortunately no GSoC students worked on this. They also have no CAD yet, see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2015-Ideas#cylindrical-algebraic-decomposition . -- Yo

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 5:03:45 AM UTC+1, William wrote: > > Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to ... > > Short update: Today is the proposal submission deadline. We are already set up for this. What still needs a little bit of further attention is the wiki page for projec

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 5:03:45 AM UTC+1, William wrote: > > Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015 I wanted to add this link to the wiki page: http://trac.sagemath.org/query?status=needs_info&status=needs_work&status=new&milestone=sa

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

I saw it on Dima's webpage http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/teaching/studentprojects/357.html But i don't know if it was actually proposed officially. Apperently there have been some movement on that aspect on sympy too: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2012-Application-Prateek-Papriwal:-Cylindri

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

Am 11.02.2015 um 13:52 schrieb mmarco: > IIRC there was an old proposal about implementing semialgebraic sets. Hello Miguel, can you point me to this old proposal? I could not find it in the list archive and on the wiki. Robert -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

Am 12.02.2015 um 15:08 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> "Add support for systems of rational inequalities". [...] > There was a mentioning of a bigger thing - computing with semialgebraic > sets, and then this topic would naturally become a part of such a project. Yes, my univariate case would fit into

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

On 2015-02-12, Robert Pollak wrote: > Am 11.02.2015 um 05:03 schrieb William Stein: >> Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to >> >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015 > > I hope it is suitable that I have added something there: > "Add support for systems of rational inequalities". it's

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

Am 11.02.2015 um 05:03 schrieb William Stein: > Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015 I hope it is suitable that I have added something there: "Add support for systems of rational inequalities". BTW, is there a way to get notified per mail when

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

Dima pointed this out to me the other day but I haven't had time to add anything to it. I'm hoping to get to it this evening with an idea of adding a Game theory project :) Thanks, Vince On Wed Feb 11 2015 at 12:52:32 PM mmarco wrote: > IIRC there was an old proposal about implementing semialge

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

IIRC there was an old proposal about implementing semialgebraic sets. It would be nice to retake it. QEPCAD could be used to do much of the heavylifting computations. I know a PhD student that plans to finish his thesis this year and works on related concepts, i can ask him about his availabili

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

On 2015-02-11, William Stein wrote: > Does anybody have any GSoC projects to add to > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015 > > There were basically zero that involved actual mathematics, so I've > added two. One is relevant for quaternion algebras and another for > modular forms. > > Hey peop

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015

Update. On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 2:06:23 PM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote: > > In two weeks... > Tomorrow, the application period starts. A major and important part of the application is a good list of prospective projects. This is a list of ideas on what students can base their project pr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC Idea: Cross Platform Native GUI

I hadn't heard of spyder before Vincent mentioned it so I looked into it and it seemed quite impressing. It runs on all platforms (including Windows), supports both Python 2.7 and 3 and is actively being developed. Spyder is quite modular in that every pa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC Idea: Cross Platform Native GUI

On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:48:14 AM UTC-5, William wrote: > > problem in practice: data point -- I think SMC worksheets have > precisely the same issue (despite not using IPython at all), and I've > not once received a question or complaint about it in 2 years. IMHO thats the differenc

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC Idea: Cross Platform Native GUI

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:07:19 AM UTC-5, William wrote: >> >> Is GTK "cross platform"? That's a core requirement... > > > IMHO yes. Gtk 2 is pretty complete, Gtk 3 might need some more love on > lesser platforms (Windows) but since th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC Idea: Cross Platform Native GUI

On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:07:19 AM UTC-5, William wrote: > > Is GTK "cross platform"? That's a core requirement... > IMHO yes. Gtk 2 is pretty complete, Gtk 3 might need some more love on lesser platforms (Windows) but since the stackoverflow question you linked to there is now an offi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC Idea: Cross Platform Native GUI

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > I wrote a basic Python + GTK Gui a while ago > https://github.com/vbraun/notebook. IMHO Gtk is more suitable because Python > is a first-class supported language, whereas Qt is C++ with a handful of > competing Python bindings of various levels

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC Idea: Cross Platform Native GUI

I wrote a basic Python + GTK Gui a while ago https://github.com/vbraun/notebook. IMHO Gtk is more suitable because Python is a first-class supported language, whereas Qt is C++ with a handful of competing Python bindings of various levels of incompleteness. But that isn't even relevent at this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC Idea: Cross Platform Native GUI

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > IMHO that is out of scope for a GSoC project. Maybe somebody with a lot of > experience could do it, but a sound MVC framework with robust test coverage > is IMHO going to take more effort. Sure, you can slap together a GUI, but > that'll just

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC Idea: Cross Platform Native GUI

IMHO that is out of scope for a GSoC project. Maybe somebody with a lot of experience could do it, but a sound MVC framework with robust test coverage is IMHO going to take more effort. Sure, you can slap together a GUI, but that'll just be another me-too notebook that'll soon be as unmaintainab

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015

I forgot to say in my message: me too! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email t

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2015

I will be quite busy this year, but if necessary, i could mentor a student. I am not as motivated as previous years, but nevertheless i am ready to help. El lunes, 26 de enero de 2015, 14:06:19 (UTC+1), Harald Schilly escribió: > > In two weeks, this years Google Summer of Code repeats and start

[sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2014 iOS App

Thanks for the reply! Right now I am trying to get more familiar with the app and its source code. I will also try to fix some issue on Bitbucket issues page. Thanks again. Aditya -- You received this message because yo

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC projects

I'd be happy to mentor a project regarding sage.matroids. Last year's participant on my project canceled at the last minute, so I hope to have better luck this year! I'll update the project description as soon as the document goes up. --Stefan. On Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:18:42 AM UTC-5, B

  1   2   3   >