On 04/20/11 01:48 PM, Simon wrote:
The whole symja thing is interesting...
how much of Mathematica's syntax are they allowed to copy without breaching
some sort of intellectual property rights?
Although this case was in the USA, and different countries have different laws,
this situation arose
On Apr 20, 2:50 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> This is interesting.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/symja/
>
> Apparently it can parse a large percentage of the Mathematica language and has
> nearly 295 functions. I note it has "D[]" and "Integrate[]" as two of them.
Well, to the extent that it's
visit sage-flame for more on this topic.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://ww
On 04/21/11 04:44 PM, rjf wrote:
There is so much wrong with Kirkby's statements, it is hard to know
where to start.
I do have a forename. I'd appreciate if you used it.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-post
On 04/20/11 05:45 PM, rjf wrote:
I tried
Do[print[i];If[i>4,Return[toobig]], {i,1,10}]
which failed. So it can't iterate
I tried
a + f[8] /. f[x_?(#> 7&)] -> aha
which it refused to parse, much less do pattern matching.
Nothing on the web site interface can include a left-hand-side for
as
There is so much wrong with Kirkby's statements, it is hard to know
where to start.
1. This symja is not a Mathematica "clone". At best it is an attempt
to build a computer algebra system in Java, and has used pieces of the
Mathematica design as a guide for some of its surface language and a
spri
On 20 April 2011 13:48, Simon wrote:
> The whole symja thing is interesting...
Symja would be much more so if it worked reasonably well. I'm told
there's no support for high precision floating point numbers, which is
why N[] is expecting only one argument. But it seems to have multiple
issues.
>
On Thursday, 21 April 2011 02:45:37 UTC+10, rjf wrote:
>
> I tried
> Do[print[i];If[i>4,Return[toobig]], {i,1,10}]
>
> which failed. So it can't iterate
>
It's lack of basic (working) loop constructions it a bit disheartening.
>
> Nothing on the web site interface can include a left-hand-side
I tried
Do[print[i];If[i>4,Return[toobig]], {i,1,10}]
which failed. So it can't iterate
I tried
a + f[8] /. f[x_?(# > 7 &)] -> aha
which it refused to parse, much less do pattern matching.
Nothing on the web site interface can include a left-hand-side for
assignment.
While I think this progr
The whole symja thing is interesting...
how much of Mathematica's syntax are they allowed to copy without breaching
some sort of intellectual property rights?
Since some claims were made about symja's integration capabilities, I tested
a few integrals...
It didn't take long to find simple integ
On 04/20/11 11:40 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 04/20/11 10:13 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
Interesting. Looking through the docs to the integration functions leads
to this website with a large number of rules for integration, which
claims that in some cases, it performs much better than MMA and Ma
On 04/20/11 10:13 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 4/20/11 3:50 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
This is interesting.
http://code.google.com/p/symja/
Apparently it can parse a large percentage of the Mathematica language
and has nearly 295 functions. I note it has "D[]" and "Integrate[]" as
two of them.
On 4/20/11 3:50 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
This is interesting.
http://code.google.com/p/symja/
Apparently it can parse a large percentage of the Mathematica language
and has nearly 295 functions. I note it has "D[]" and "Integrate[]" as
two of them.
You can try it online at
http://mobmath.a
13 matches
Mail list logo
