Re: [sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-07 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, January 4, 2013 12:22:18 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2013-01-04 11:31, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > By the way, GCC 4.7.2 can compile ECL 12.12.1 on Cygwin, what GCC 4.6.3 > > cannot, so it would be nice to have a minimal GCC 4.7.2 spkg. > This is harder than you think. G

[sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-04 Thread kcrisman
> > >>> But in the spirit of actually getting #6743 finished, maybe for now we >>> could just have the GCC spkg check whether Cygwin 4.5.x is installed? >>> After all, we need GCC to compile GCC, right? >>> >> I don't see exactly what is really gained by requiring gcc but not g++ >>> or gfor

[sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:22:37 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:12:35 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, January 4, 2013 5:31:23 AM UTC-5, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >>> >>> By the way, GCC 4.7.2 can compile ECL 12.12.1 on Cygwin, what GCC 4.

[sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:12:35 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 4, 2013 5:31:23 AM UTC-5, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >> >> By the way, GCC 4.7.2 can compile ECL 12.12.1 on Cygwin, what GCC 4.6.3 >> cannot, so it would be nice to have a minimal GCC 4.7.2 spkg. >> (Cygwin shi

[sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-04 Thread kcrisman
On Friday, January 4, 2013 5:31:23 AM UTC-5, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > By the way, GCC 4.7.2 can compile ECL 12.12.1 on Cygwin, what GCC 4.6.3 > cannot, so it would be nice to have a minimal GCC 4.7.2 spkg. > (Cygwin shipped GCC 4.5.3 is ok as well, but in the spirit of as few > dependencies

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, January 4, 2013 12:22:18 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2013-01-04 11:31, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > By the way, GCC 4.7.2 can compile ECL 12.12.1 on Cygwin, what GCC 4.6.3 > > cannot, so it would be nice to have a minimal GCC 4.7.2 spkg. > This is harder than you think. G

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2013-01-04 11:31, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > By the way, GCC 4.7.2 can compile ECL 12.12.1 on Cygwin, what GCC 4.6.3 > cannot, so it would be nice to have a minimal GCC 4.7.2 spkg. This is harder than you think. GCC-4.6.3 is released as separate pieces, but GCC-4.7.2 is released monolithically.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, January 4, 2013 11:38:09 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2013-01-04 11:31, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > By the way, GCC 4.7.2 can compile ECL 12.12.1 on Cygwin, what GCC 4.6.3 > > cannot > Do you have a pointer to the error message for GCC-4.6.3? And does this > refer to the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2013-01-04 11:31, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > By the way, GCC 4.7.2 can compile ECL 12.12.1 on Cygwin, what GCC 4.6.3 > cannot Do you have a pointer to the error message for GCC-4.6.3? And does this refer to the Sage-shipped GCC or the Cygwin-shipped GCC? -- You received this message because yo

[sage-devel] Re: GCC optional spkg

2013-01-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
By the way, GCC 4.7.2 can compile ECL 12.12.1 on Cygwin, what GCC 4.6.3 cannot, so it would be nice to have a minimal GCC 4.7.2 spkg. (Cygwin shipped GCC 4.5.3 is ok as well, but in the spirit of as few dependencies as possible...) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the