On Aug 21, 9:08 am, "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps Sage can implement some form of pattern matching and
> subsitution such is done by Axiom's rewrite rules? I think that in
> many respects these provide a functionality similar to Mathematica.
>
> There is also a similar re-writi
On Aug 21, 2008, at 8:08 AM, Bill Page wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:50 AM, mhampton wrote:
>>
>> I really need to go to sleep so I won't do a top-ten, but here's a
>> top 2:
>>
>> 1) Powerful substitutions and rules. Sage does not have anything
>> comparable. The .subs() function is bu
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:50 AM, mhampton wrote:
>
> I really need to go to sleep so I won't do a top-ten, but here's a
> top 2:
>
> 1) Powerful substitutions and rules. Sage does not have anything
> comparable. The .subs() function is buggy even in its limited
> domain. There have been previo
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:37 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I used to really enjoy writing programs in mathematica, but maybe I'm
>> a strange person. I only stopped in order to force myself to get
>> f
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:37 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I used to really enjoy writing programs in mathematica, but maybe I'm
> a strange person. I only stopped in order to force myself to get
> fluent with Sage. I think it just depends on your background, what
> you are used to
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:50 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I really need to go to sleep so I won't do a top-ten, but here's a top
> 2:
Thanks for reminding me this. It seems that people really like
Mathematica, so when I graudate, I'll try to learn it and do something
in it, so that
I really need to go to sleep so I won't do a top-ten, but here's a top
2:
1) Powerful substitutions and rules. Sage does not have anything
comparable. The .subs() function is buggy even in its limited
domain. There have been previous posts on sage-devel that give good
examples of this.
2) Imp
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:37 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I used to really enjoy writing programs in mathematica, but maybe I'm
> a strange person. I only stopped in order to force myself to get
> fluent with Sage. I think it just depends on your background, what
> you are used to
I used to really enjoy writing programs in mathematica, but maybe I'm
a strange person. I only stopped in order to force myself to get
fluent with Sage. I think it just depends on your background, what
you are used to, and what you want to do. For symbolic calculations
and programming I still m
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but
> programming in Mathematica is not fun.
And that would be the understatement of the week.
Cheers,
f
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegrou
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, certainly I think Axiom domains are viable. Another way of asking
>> this question is: if static strongly typed language with first-order
>> polymorphic dependent types is viable? I think this has been answered
>> I would be glad (with your permission) to post this question and my
>> reply on-list somewhere - sage-devel if you prefer.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> Hi Bill,
>>>
>>> since you know both Python and Aldor or Axiom and now you know
>>> Sage quite a bit, do you
12 matches
Mail list logo