[sage-devel] Re: Error while building sage 8.8 due to igraph

2019-04-01 Thread David Coudert
The problem has been fixed. The packages were missing in the repository. Of course, it takes time to update all the mirrors. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

[sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage

2019-03-04 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon 2019-03-04 19:01:49 UTC+1, hrishabh on sage-devel: > > I am installing sage's developer version. After extracting > sage-8.6.tar.gz and then ran make file. Following Error > occured after one hour of build: > > Copying package files from temporary location > /home/hrishabh/Documents/Sage/sage-

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-04-04 00:25:22 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 9:47:37 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 9:30:41 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: >>> >>> On the contrary, I believe requiring someone to build an entirely >>> separate compiler toolchain

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Erik Bray
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 8:30:41 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> > IMHO the pre-reqs needed to build Sage on Linux ought to include >> > gfortran >> > and g++ (why not? listin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Erik Bray
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 9:30:41 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> On the contrary, I believe requiring someone to build an entirely >> separate compiler toolchain is more burdensome and both user- and >> developer-hostile compared to fixing

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 9:47:37 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 9:30:41 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> On the contrary, I believe requiring someone to build an entirely >> separate compiler toolchain is more burdensome and both user- and >> developer-hostile

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Volker Braun
On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 9:30:41 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: > > On the contrary, I believe requiring someone to build an entirely > separate compiler toolchain is more burdensome and both user- and > developer-hostile compared to fixing the issue with that compiler I.e. getting some older li

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 8:30:41 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > IMHO the pre-reqs needed to build Sage on Linux ought to include > gfortran > > and g++ (why not? listing them won't harm, even if the gcc version is > > blacklisted

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Erik Bray
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > IMHO the pre-reqs needed to build Sage on Linux ought to include gfortran > and g++ (why not? listing them won't harm, even if the gcc version is > blacklisted) > > This is becoming an issue - there was a post recently about a failure to > bu

[sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread cozzy
Thanks, removing the qd package indeed helped to build SageMath. Is it safe now to install the qd back to the system? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

[sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Dima Pasechnik
IMHO the pre-reqs needed to build Sage on Linux ought to include gfortran and g++ (why not? listing them won't harm, even if the gcc version is blacklisted) This is becoming an issue - there was a post recently about a failure to build Sage on a newish Linux system, with error in building Sage'

[sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Volker Braun
Pretty clear that its a dual abi issue, libfplll discovers your system libqd and decides to link against it. But your system is new enough to use the new cxx11 abi, whereas the Sage-built gcc is not. Hence linking fails with undefined std::__cxx11 symbols, as expected. This is probably going to

[sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-02 Thread cozzy
Sure. File *libfplll-20160107.log *is in the attachment. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-02 Thread Volker Braun
can you post the entire log? On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 2:24:06 AM UTC+2, cozzy wrote: > > Hi I've encountered this error while building Sage from sources obtained > from git -clone. I'm running Manjaro Linux 4.3.3-3-ARCH. Any ideas? > > Thanks > John > > /lib/../lib64/libqd.so: undefined re