[sage-devel] Re: Curious problem with Sage "fat_binary" tarballs

2014-07-24 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2014 01:38:54 UTC+2, kcrisman a écrit : > > > > SAGE_FAT_BINRAY is quite fragile. >> If you really want me to, I can break it on quite every system. >> Are the machine really different? >> Maybe its just a problem with R and can be fixed. >> >> > I think that is quite likely a

[sage-devel] Re: Curious problem with Sage "fat_binary" tarballs

2014-07-24 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Le mercredi 23 juillet 2014 22:59:54 UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori a écrit : > > SAGE_FAT_BINRAY is quite fragile. > If you really want me to, I can break it on quite every system. > Are the machine really different? > Yes. I have a good laptop (core I7, 16 GB RAM), but my pinchy employer insists on

[sage-devel] Re: Curious problem with Sage "fat_binary" tarballs

2014-07-23 Thread kcrisman
SAGE_FAT_BINRAY is quite fragile. > If you really want me to, I can break it on quite every system. > Are the machine really different? > Maybe its just a problem with R and can be fixed. > > I think that is quite likely and could be fixed with spkg-install or whatever is used now... -- You r

[sage-devel] Re: Curious problem with Sage "fat_binary" tarballs

2014-07-23 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
SAGE_FAT_BINRAY is quite fragile. If you really want me to, I can break it on quite every system. Are the machine really different? Maybe its just a problem with R and can be fixed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe fr