On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:03:15 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 2012-09-26, Greg Laun > wrote:
> >
> > sage: matrix(GL(2),2,[1,0,0,1]) in GL(2,CC)
> > True
>
> Do you mean "GF(2)" on the left hand side?
>
Ahh, yes I did mean that.
>
> >
> > so 'in' ignores base
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:19:31 PM UTC-7, Greg Laun wrote:
>
> Whoops, gmail sent the email before I was finished.
>
> I think a more appropriate way to do the comparison would be to check
> if self(x) == x. This is how contains is implemented in parent.pyx.
>
In theory this looks
On 2012-09-26, Greg Laun wrote:
> --=_Part_757_16956430.1348690771123
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Whoops, gmail sent the email before I was finished.
>
> I think a more appropriate way to do the comparison would be to check
> if self(x) == x. This is how contains i
Hi Greg,
On 2012-09-26, Greg Laun wrote:
>
> sage: matrix(GL(2),2,[1,0,0,1]) in GL(2,CC)
> True
Do you mean "GF(2)" on the left hand side?
>
> so 'in' ignores base ring. The problem is that __contains__ for
> general_linear.pyx and special_linear.pyx only check whether a matrix can
> be coer
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:07:31 PM UTC-7, Greg Laun wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm sorry if this has been discussed, but I can't find a discussion. I
> noticed the following behavior:
>
> sage: matrix(GL(2),2,[1,0,0,1]) in GL(2,CC)
> True
>
> so 'in' ignores base ring. The problem is t
Whoops, gmail sent the email before I was finished.
I think a more appropriate way to do the comparison would be to check
if self(x) == x. This is how contains is implemented in parent.pyx.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Greg
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:07:31 PM UTC-4, Greg Laun wrote:
>
