[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-03-29 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello, > There is an issue left. We decided not to type some basic objects like > partitions or permutations; so you can't use object oriented syntax on > them, like in t::shape()::hook_lengths(). This has some advantages > (see our design article in SLC 2004) but whether this was a good or > bad

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-03-29 Thread Mike Hansen
-- Forwarded message -- From: Nicolas M. Thiery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mar 29, 2007 2:53 PM Subject: Re: Combinatorics in SAGE To: Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: sage-devel@googlegroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED], aldor-combinat-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Dear Mike,

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-03-28 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello Nicolas, > How much "man-year" do you expect to put on this project? I mean, it > took us 6 years to develop MuPAD-Combinat. But of course, reusing past > experience, one can hope to go quite faster. I've been relatively busy with school stuff since graduation will be here before I know it

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-03-28 Thread Mike Hansen
-- Forwarded message -- From: Nicolas M. Thiery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mar 28, 2007 1:10 PM Subject: Re: Combinatorics in SAGE To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Mike, My post (two weeks ago) to sage-devel was rejected. Could you please forward it on my behalf? Thanks in adv

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-25 Thread William Stein
On 25 Feb 2007 18:34:38 +0100, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Axiom is not part of SAGE, so the fact they are implemented in Axiom doesn't > > imply that one should not implement them in SAGE. > > OK, sorry, I was misinformed. I once was told that SAGE aims at connecting > different C

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-25 Thread Martin Rubey
"William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Axiom is not part of SAGE, so the fact they are implemented in Axiom doesn't > imply that one should not implement them in SAGE. OK, sorry, I was misinformed. I once was told that SAGE aims at connecting different CAS and special purpose packages, in

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-25 Thread William Stein
On 2/25/07, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hansen wrote: > > I'm almost done with the parts on partitions, permutations, tableaux, > > skew tableaux, and tabloids. > > I do not really know what you aim at: these things are implemented in > our combinatorics package (for axiom), too. Don'

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-25 Thread Martin
I finally manged to sign up... Mike Hansen wrote: > I'm almost done with the parts on partitions, permutations, tableaux, > skew tableaux, and tabloids. I do not really know what you aim at: these things are implemented in our combinatorics package (for axiom), too. Don't you think we should coo

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-24 Thread Iftikhar Burhanuddin
Dear folks, While we are on the topic of "Combinatorics in SAGE", it will be a healthy exercise to make a todo list of what is needed. I look forward to the day when I can teach Combinatorics (undergrad) classes in CS/Math using SAGE. For starters volunteers can sift through standard textbooks to

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-24 Thread Mike Hansen
I'm almost done with the parts on partitions, permutations, tableaux, skew tableaux, and tabloids. On 2/24/07, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe something for partitions too... I'm working on stuff that's all > partitions and permutations, and SAGE doesn't seem to speak fluently

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-24 Thread Robert Miller
Maybe something for partitions too... I'm working on stuff that's all partitions and permutations, and SAGE doesn't seem to speak fluently in this area yet. On Feb 23, 3:02 pm, "Nick Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 23, 1:01 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > O

[sage-devel] Re: [Aldor-combinat-devel] TR: [sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-24 Thread William Stein
On Saturday 24 February 2007 12:42 am, Martin Rubey wrote: > Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please subscribe me... You can sign up at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel If you try and have any trouble at all, let me know. The rest of this email is being cc'

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-23 Thread Nick Alexander
On Feb 23, 1:01 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/23/07, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The last couple days I've been working on adding a fair amount of > > functionality to the combinat module of SAGE. Mostly, I'd like to get > > it roughly as feature-complet

[sage-devel] Re: Combinatorics in SAGE

2007-02-23 Thread William Stein
On 2/23/07, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The last couple days I've been working on adding a fair amount of > functionality to the combinat module of SAGE. Mostly, I'd like to get > it roughly as feature-complete as mupad-combinat or combinatorica. Excellent! Also look at the combina