GAP subgroups know its parent, which in the case of permutation groups
amount to knowing the domain of action.
Sage ought to follow the suit, IMHO
On May 21, 6:36 am, Jason B Hill wrote:
> This is definitely an example of where Sage and GAP differ in their
> approaches, but this is more about sub
Hi Jason,
Thanks for your comments. I was mulling some commentary on your
previous post about permutation groups, but my comments are just
applicable in this case, so here goes.
My main interest in Sage is its use in my teaching. GAP is a perfect
example. I've always felt that the syntax and l
