lutusp wrote:
> I'm aware there has been some discussion of this issue in the past,
> but I would like to renew it. I understand that canonical DE notation
> isn't on everyone's short list of high priorities, but I think
> students and those with little Sage exposure would appreciate the
> ability
On Oct 13, 2:09 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> I agree that this notation is nice. One issue with this approach is
> that the single quote is already used in Python. For example,
>
> sage: u'(x) + y'
> u'(x) + y'
>
> sage: type(_)
>
>
> sage: r'''(t)'''
> '(t)'
>
> How would one distingui
Hi!
On 13 Okt., 23:09, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
...
> sage: u'(x) + y'
> u'(x) + y'
>
> sage: type(_)
>
Very good example! Since ' is used for python strings, I guess the
only realistic chance is to look for different, but similar
characters. For example ` (backtick) or ´ (no idea how this o
On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:24 PM, lutusp wrote:
> I'm aware there has been some discussion of this issue in the past,
> but I would like to renew it. I understand that canonical DE notation
> isn't on everyone's short list of high priorities, but I think
> students and those with little Sage exposure
