Thanks I'll have a look into that.
S.
* John H Palmieri [2019-05-03 10:57:31]:
On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 10:22:25 AM UTC-7, Salvatore Stella wrote:
Hi All,
has anyone tried installing CHomP recently? For me it fails applying
patches.
It is an old-style package and apparently it is very st
On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 10:22:25 AM UTC-7, Salvatore Stella wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> has anyone tried installing CHomP recently? For me it fails applying
> patches.
> It is an old-style package and apparently it is very stale; does it
> provide
> any tangible speedup in `ChainComplex_class.hom
>
> > The optional package ChomP installs cleanly but then does not actually
> > work on Sage 6.1.1 on OS X Mavericks.
>
> Seems this is fixed in Sage 6.2.
>
You're completely right, sorry about that. For some reason, I thought Sage
6.2 was still in beta and so didn't test it there. I tried
Nathan Dunfield wrote:
The optional package ChomP installs cleanly but then does not actually
work on Sage 6.1.1 on OS X Mavericks.
Seems this is fixed in Sage 6.2.
-leif
/pkgs/sage-6.1/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/interfaces/chomp.pyc
in __call__(self, program, complex, subcomple
Sorry, my original message had a typo. I have observed this only with Sage
6.1.1 on OS X Mavericks not "both platforms".
> The optional package ChomP installs cleanly but then does not actually
> work on Sage 6.1.1 on OS X Mavericks. The specific error I get on both
> platforms is below.
Thank you. Installing Command line tools did the trick.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this g
On 2013-03-22, KrisP wrote:
> --=_Part_587_10508096.1363949706089
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I am running Sage 5.8 64 bit on a macbook pro with OS X 10.8.3.
>
> Whenever I install the experimental package chomp, I always get an
> installation error. The log is below.
+1
I haven't had any trouble compiling CHomP on a variety of linux and OS
X machines. It seems like high quality code that easily qualifies for
optional status.
-Marshall
On Dec 16, 6:52 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> Right now, CHomP is an experimental spkg for Sage. I propose that it
> be opt
