On Jan 13, 2:33 pm, Charles Bouillaguet
wrote:
> Well, I would prefer this thing to print "0.0", just as a gentle reminder
> that the result may not be accurate…
Well, the zero polynomial really is something different from the
constant 0.0. Printing 0 reminds you that really no term is present
he
On Jan 13, 10:01 am, Marco Streng wrote:
> Polynomials in Sage have a well-defined degree, and that means that
> the leading coefficient cannot be (numerically) zero, the degree of
> 0.0 is ambiguous unless we decide that 0.0 is just 0, in which case we
> may as well print it as such.
That's good
