>
>
> $ git diff src/sage/sets/disjoint_union_enumerated_sets.py
> diff --git a/src/sage/sets/disjoint_union_enumerated_sets.py
> b/src/sage/sets/disjoint_union_enumerated_sets.py
> index c6d35ea8bd..f5fdba7119 100644
> --- a/src/sage/sets/disjoint_union_enumerated_sets.py
> +++ b/src/sage/se
On Jun 20, 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel wrote:
That definitely is not a bug in CombinatorialFreeModule, so there shouldn't be
anything changed there. It is doing what it is told: that its indexing set is
in finite sets. I would say the bug is purely in the
DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets not doi
That definitely is not a bug in CombinatorialFreeModule, so there shouldn't
be anything changed there. It is doing what it is told: that its indexing
set is in finite sets. I would say the bug is purely in the
DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets not doing a full check of its member sets.
Best,
Travis
On Jun 20, Markus Wageringel wrote:
I think the problem here is that enumerating over a disjoint union of an
infinite set and a finite set will never reach the elements in the finite set.
There is this comment in the documentation of DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets
Possible extensions: the cu
I think the problem here is that enumerating over a disjoint union of an
infinite set and a finite set will never reach the elements in the finite
set. There is this comment in the documentation of
DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets
Possible extensions: the current enumeration order is not suitable
