On Jun 6, 10:05 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never understood why Mathematica still supports HPUX other for
> historical reasons. And I would imagine most HPUX/Itanium boxen would
> run non-scientific workloads, i.e. databases.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
Even more puzzling is why Math
On Jun 6, 10:30 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jun 6, 9:05 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> > > * Then Solaris became free and open source.
>
> > Well, you still have to register for the privilege to download
> > security fixes and that is annoying. I a
On Jun 6, 9:05 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Then Solaris became free and open source.
>
> Well, you still have to register for the privilege to download
> security fixes and that is annoying. I am sure that many people once
> they get Solaris up and running will be turned off by
On Jun 6, 6:44 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 8:31 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 6, 7:00 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Great, I copied your revised ntl package from your home directory (on
> > > > my Sun Ultra 60 called 'mai
On Jun 6, 9:32 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 7:44 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> > > The Solaris port does seem to be coming on, which is good. The ntl fix
> > > from Francois seems to work on both my SPARCs. I do have another
> > > problem,
On Jun 6, 7:44 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Solaris port does seem to be coming on, which is good. The ntl fix
> > from Francois seems to work on both my SPARCs. I do have another
> > problem, but that needs to be on another subject, not this one.
>
> Thanks for testing ;)
I sh
On Jun 6, 8:31 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 7:00 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Great, I copied your revised ntl package from your home directory (on
> > > my Sun Ultra 60 called 'main-webserver') and it works ok, on both that
> > > Sun and also
On Jun 6, 7:00 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Great, I copied your revised ntl package from your home directory (on
> > my Sun Ultra 60 called 'main-webserver') and it works ok, on both that
> > Sun and also on my Blade 2000 (kestrel) - no great surprise there, as
> > the two Suns ar
On Jun 6, 7:45 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 1:04 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Never mind! Silly me had removed "-shared" from the linking line.
> > I got past ntl.
>
> Great, I copied your revised ntl package from your home directory (on
> my Sun
On Jun 6, 1:04 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Never mind! Silly me had removed "-shared" from the linking line.
> I got past ntl.
Great, I copied your revised ntl package from your home directory (on
my Sun Ultra 60 called 'main-webserver') and it works ok, on both that
Sun and also
On Jun 6, 11:03 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I almost got it. It is make proof, I have a just a -fpic to clean.
> I have one last error that I am not sure how to deal with:
> g++ -I../include -I. -O2 -g -fPIC -fpic -o libntl.so FFT.o FacVec.o
> GF2.o GF2E.o GF2EX.o GF2EXFactoring
I almost got it. It is make proof, I have a just a -fpic to clean.
I have one last error that I am not sure how to deal with:
g++ -I../include -I. -O2 -g -fPIC -fpic -o libntl.so FFT.o FacVec.o
GF2.o GF2E.o GF2EX.o GF2EXFactoring.o GF2X.o GF2X1.o GF2XFactoring.o
GF2XVec.o GetTime.o HNF.o ctools
On Jun 6, 2:03 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 11:07 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I guess it happens because the makefile is full of direct calls
> > to make rather than something like $MAKE. So even if you
> > started with gmake you will call make eventually w
On Jun 5, 4:13 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 Jun, 15:03, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> > Well, we require gmake anyway for freetype since that specifically
> > requires gmake. gld should not be required, at least unless we call it
> > explicitly.
>
>
On 5 Jun, 15:03, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, we require gmake anyway for freetype since that specifically
> requires gmake. gld should not be required, at least unless we call it
> explicitly.
The only way I can get things to at least work semi-well is to copy
gmake to $HOME/bi
On Jun 5, 11:07 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess it happens because the makefile is full of direct calls
> to make rather than something like $MAKE. So even if you
> started with gmake you will call make eventually which will
> protest to GNU-ism. Add this to my TODO list:
> Fin
I guess it happens because the makefile is full of direct calls
to make rather than something like $MAKE. So even if you
started with gmake you will call make eventually which will
protest to GNU-ism. Add this to my TODO list:
Find a way of assigning a variable/macro inside a target
that is GNU in
On Jun 5, 1:37 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> For what it is worth, this is line 522:
>
> shobj: FPICFLAG = -fPIC
>
> Perhaps I should have built it from scratch with gnu make. Anyway, I
> hope I've found a few things that hopefully someone has some idea how
> to fix!!!
On Jun 5, 2:32 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I set up a Sun Ultra 60 for testing of sage and have mailed a couple
> of people passwords. I just checked this, and found another issue with
> NTL on the Ultra 60 which I did not notice on the Blade 2000.
>
> It appears to fail
19 matches
Mail list logo
