>
> However, I've had no success running RJF's code. I would have thought the ANSI
> Common Lisp would have covered how commands are loaded, but I am told that is
> not so. If Richard could suggest how his code might be modified to run with
> ECL,
> then I'd like to give it a quick try and post m
On 09/ 9/10 03:32 AM, Tim Daly wrote:
Some of the questions you have about "why lisp" are answered in:
http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Expert-to-Expert-Rich-Hickey-and-Brian-Beckman-Inside-Clojure/
which is about Clojure, a more recent lisp although the ideas are
essentially the same i
Some of the questions you have about "why lisp" are answered in:
http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Expert-to-Expert-Rich-Hickey-and-Brian-Beckman-Inside-Clojure/
which is about Clojure, a more recent lisp although the ideas are
essentially the same in Common Lisp.
Tim Daly
David Kirkby w
On Sep 6, 3:49 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> Anyway, I think I have the code OK now, but I did not get very far with that
> at
> all.
>
> I used 'ecl' which is built as part of Sage, set up the environment to run run
> sage, but did not run it. Instead I called ecl directly after sticking your
On 09/05/2010 05:23 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 5 September 2010 10:14, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>> On 09/05/2010 03:52 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>> I'm quite happy to be that someone who learns Lisp - I'm serious
>>> thinking of buying a book on it. Unfortunately, they tend to be quite
>>> expensive,
On Sep 5, 5:40 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
>What seems to be a common theme is using Python, but it's not clear to
>me this is optimal. It might be simpler to pass the unmodified input
>from Sage to Lisp and do the rest there.
>
>RJF thinks Lisp is the best language
>William thinks Python is God
>
>I
On 09/ 2/10 11:41 PM, rjf wrote:
On Sep 2, 2:23 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
On 09/ 2/10 06:10 AM, rjf wrote:
the mathematica syntax parser that I wrote appears to run inside
Maxima, so
you can, if you wish, feed such text to the mma-in-maxima system.
Sorry to sound green, but I barely
On 09/ 6/10 07:37 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Doing it in C was quite attractive to me personally until you pointed
out that lex/yacc would solve the problem.
Oops - you said lex/yacc would not solve the problem.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On 09/ 6/10 01:40 AM, rjf wrote:
On Sep 5, 2:40 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
It is however very clear there are far more people know Python than
Lisp, so use of Python is more attractive to more developers.
Dave
More people know C than Python. More people use Windows than Linux.
More people
On Sep 5, 2:40 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 5 September 2010 22:13, William Stein wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, September 5, 2010, David Kirkby wrote:
> >> RJF thinks Lisp is the best language
> >> William thinks Python is God
>
> > No I don't.
>
> > I chose Python for Sage because in 2004 it was th
On 5 September 2010 10:14, Mitesh Patel wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 09/05/2010 03:52 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> I'm quite happy to be that someone who learns Lisp - I'm serious
>> thinking of buying a book on it. Unfortunately, they tend to be quite
>> expensive, as do books on writing compilers.
>
Hi David,
On 09/05/2010 03:52 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> I'm quite happy to be that someone who learns Lisp - I'm serious
> thinking of buying a book on it. Unfortunately, they tend to be quite
> expensive, as do books on writing compilers.
Some time ago, I found "Practical Common Lisp" by P. Seib
On 2 September 2010 23:41, rjf wrote:
>> There's no README file in the source code I found of yours, so it's far from
>> obvious to me how I would use it.
> um, I don't know where you looked, but
>
> here is one place..
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~fateman/mma1.6/
Adding a README file would hel
On Sep 2, 2:23 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> On 09/ 2/10 06:10 AM, rjf wrote:
>
>
>
> > the mathematica syntax parser that I wrote appears to run inside
> > Maxima, so
> > you can, if you wish, feed such text to the mma-in-maxima system.
>
> Sorry to sound green, but I barely know Maxima, and
On 09/ 2/10 06:10 AM, rjf wrote:
the mathematica syntax parser that I wrote appears to run inside
Maxima, so
you can, if you wish, feed such text to the mma-in-maxima system.
Sorry to sound green, but I barely know Maxima, and do not know Lisp at all.
I do know Mathematica - though I'm certai
the mathematica syntax parser that I wrote appears to run inside
Maxima, so
you can, if you wish, feed such text to the mma-in-maxima system.
The intent in that project is mainly to take mma syntax for
expressions and map it into
maxima, and not take the big step of having a more-or-less full
ma
On 2 September 2010 04:01, Felix Lawrence wrote:
> I think there's some confusion here. kcrisman seems to be talking
> about allowing the Mathematica interface to parse mathematica output,
> importing it to Sage. Dave seems to be proposing writing something
> that lets Sage run mathematica code
> > > whuss at some point added something like this for both Mma and Maple,
> > > though very basic, as part of another ticket (symbolic sums?). I
> > > can't remember where it is and am unfortunately having some internet
> > > issues :( but anyway I believe this code was merged into Sage at some
On Sep 1, 1:30 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 17:45, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 1, 11:55 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> >> Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
> >> seen a recent video from William stating it is NOT an aim of Sage to
> >> be cl
On 1 September 2010 17:45, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 1, 11:55 am, David Kirkby wrote:
>> Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
>> seen a recent video from William stating it is NOT an aim of Sage to
>> be clone of any of the 4 M's - in contrast, Octave is a clo
On Sep 1, 11:55 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
> seen a recent video from William stating it is NOT an aim of Sage to
> be clone of any of the 4 M's - in contrast, Octave is a clone of
> MATLAB.
>
> Whilst parsing Mathematica code
21 matches
Mail list logo
