On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Moreover, I just tried and the full test suite passes too. Yeah!
>
I had two failures,
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/birds_other.rst"
A mysterious error (perhaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have
crashed doctest.
> (2) getting the above two spkg's positively reviewed and into Sage.
I have downloaded it and will develop some 64-bit code with it (Drew
Sutherland's smalljac, for those interested; see #965). I'll take a
look at those spkg reviews if I can squeeze some time out of this
conference.
Nic
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:51 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In case anybody wants to try out 64-bit Sage on OS X, I posted a
>>> binary here:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wstein.org/h
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:51 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In case anybody wants to try out 64-bit Sage on OS X, I posted a
>> binary here:
>>
>>
>> http://wstein.org/home/wstein/binaries/sage-4.1-OSX-10.5-Intel-64bit-i386-Darwin.d
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:51 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In case anybody wants to try out 64-bit Sage on OS X, I posted a binary here:
>
>
> http://wstein.org/home/wstein/binaries/sage-4.1-OSX-10.5-Intel-64bit-i386-Darwin.dmg
>
> Sage almost builds out of the box on 64-bit OS X, except sc
