Okay done, yeah you're right this shows a bit more of a trend.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkPdD0Nnsj7BdDBENDRxTVNtR3c2VEVPeWpSN3BvV1E
On Thursday, December 27, 2012 10:17:10 AM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> I think "days since last release" is not very meaningful. Can you try
>
I think "days since last release" is not very meaningful. Can you try
"tickets in this release" instead to measure the size of a release?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.
I'm afraid this isn't particularly cool looking but, here is some data and
a couple of charts:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkPdD0Nnsj7BdDBENDRxTVNtR3c2VEVPeWpSN3BvV1E
I was hoping to see some stronger trends, but I think due to the nature of
Sage development (Sage days etc.) ther
On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 3:27:43 PM UTC-5, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:24:14 PM UTC+1, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>>
>> The following 59 people contributed to this release. Of those, 4 made
>> their first contribution to Sage:
>>
>> Is there a graph of this o
On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:24:14 PM UTC+1, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> The following 59 people contributed to this release. Of those, 4 made
> their first contribution to Sage:
>
> Is there a graph of this over time?
>
Not that I'm aware of. Therefore: the source data for this weeks Sage
