[sage-devel] Re: 3.4.2 64 bit MacIntel 10.5 binary with only *one* doctest failure

2009-05-13 Thread mabshoff
On May 13, 2:37 pm, mark mcclure wrote: > On May 12, 3:27 am, mabshoff wrote: Hi, > > I have build a 3.4.2 binary with various fixes and posted it at > >    http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/OSX64/ > > Please give it a spin if you care about 64 bit OSX. > > Seems to work OK on my

[sage-devel] Re: 3.4.2 64 bit MacIntel 10.5 binary with only *one* doctest failure

2009-05-13 Thread mark mcclure
On May 12, 3:27 am, mabshoff wrote: > I have build a 3.4.2 binary with various fixes and posted it at >    http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/OSX64/ > Please give it a spin if you care about 64 bit OSX. Seems to work OK on my Mac Pro, although I hardly put it to the test. Are there a

[sage-devel] Re: 3.4.2 64 bit MacIntel 10.5 binary with only *one* doctest failure

2009-05-12 Thread mabshoff
On May 12, 10:37 am, William Stein wrote: > 2009/5/12 mabshoff : > I can resolve the failure in gen.pyx easily: Just completely delete > the finitefield_init function!     Well, nuking functionality is always a solution ;) >  This pari function has always been > flakie, IMHO, and is used n

[sage-devel] Re: 3.4.2 64 bit MacIntel 10.5 binary with only *one* doctest failure

2009-05-12 Thread William Stein
2009/5/12 mabshoff : > > Hello folks, > > due to Martin Albrecht tracking down the evasive libSingular issue > (turns out it was a linker oddity due to static libs being linked > multiple times into an extension in case you care) I have build a > 3.4.2 binary with various fixes and posted it at >