On Nov 1, 12:20 pm, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.8.11.alpha0 builds and seems to run fine on my gentoo 32-bit machine.
> However, I have this one failed doc-test (which appears to basically be a
> precision issue):
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:03:23 -0700, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/1/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I have released 2.8.11.alpha0 at
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.11.alpha0.tar
>>
>> It passes testall on sage.math, but I would like to
On 11/1/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have released 2.8.11.alpha0 at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.11.alpha0.tar
>
> It passes testall on sage.math, but I would like to get some build
> feedback on OSX 10.4, both PPC and Intel flavors, as well as 32 bit
mabshoff wrote:
> I have released 2.8.11.alpha0 at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.11.alpha0.tar
>
> It passes testall on sage.math, but I would like to get some build
> feedback on OSX 10.4, both PPC and Intel flavors, as well as 32 bit
> Linux. I plan to release 2.8.
