[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-23 Thread William Stein
> > >> sage: Ribbon([[2,3],[1,4,5]]).is_standard() > > >> False > > > > >> sage: SkewTableau([[None, 2], [1, 3]]).is_standard() > > >> False > > > > I got the exact same two doctest failures with Fedora Core 7 on PPC 32 > Linux. Everything else passes. Hi, I was able to figure this out: 1

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-23 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 22, 7:16 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hansen wrote: > > If it's not too much trouble, could you verify that the source of > > SkewTableau.is_standard is the following: > > > t = self > > #Check to make sure that it is filled with 1...size > > w

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-23 Thread John Cremona
Maybe I'm just not patient enough. WIth a fresh 2.8.5 install from source it gets past this point, and the previously "stuck" test of constructions takes 32s on my machine. The difference with the -verbose option switched on is that there is enough output not to get bored by 32s of inactivity...

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-22 Thread William Stein
On 9/22/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: \> On Sep 22, 2007, at 10:47 AM, John Cremona wrote: > > Strange: after adding -verbose, it has got way past the point where > > it had previously stuck (but has not finished the testall yet). > > Yes this is what happened to me too. I have no i

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-22 Thread Jaap Spies
Mike Hansen wrote: > If it's not too much trouble, could you verify that the source of > SkewTableau.is_standard is the following: > > t = self > #Check to make sure that it is filled with 1...size > w = self.to_word() > w.sort() > if w != range(1, self.siz

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-22 Thread David Harvey
On Sep 22, 2007, at 10:47 AM, John Cremona wrote: > > Strange: after adding -verbose, it has got way past the point where > it had previously stuck (but has not finished the testall yet). Yes this is what happened to me too. I have no idea what to make of this. david --~--~-~--~--

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-22 Thread John Cremona
Strange: after adding -verbose, it has got way past the point where it had previously stuck (but has not finished the testall yet). John On 9/22/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sep 22, 2007, at 10:09 AM, John Cremona wrote: > > > > > I upgraded to 2.8.5 ok (kubuntu 7.04, ke

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-22 Thread David Harvey
On Sep 22, 2007, at 10:09 AM, John Cremona wrote: > > I upgraded to 2.8.5 ok (kubuntu 7.04, kernel 2.6.20-16-generic, gcc > version 4.1.2). > > sage --testall hangs at this point: > Testing SAGE constructions guide > sage -t const.tex Yes I got this too, on mac os 10.4.10, intel core duo. Wha

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-22 Thread John Cremona
I upgraded to 2.8.5 ok (kubuntu 7.04, kernel 2.6.20-16-generic, gcc version 4.1.2). sage --testall hangs at this point: Testing SAGE constructions guide sage -t const.tex and "ps -ux" shows that all the processes are in swap (S status). Also Ctrl-C did not kill it, I am having to kill all the p

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-22 Thread Mike Hansen
If it's not too much trouble, could you verify that the source of SkewTableau.is_standard is the following: t = self #Check to make sure that it is filled with 1...size w = self.to_word() w.sort() if w != range(1, self.size()+1): return False

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-22 Thread Jaap Spies
Mike Hansen wrote: > Hello Jaap, > > I'm having a hard time reproducing those doctest failures, and I was > wondering if you might help me out. Do you still get the failures if > you run sage -t on those files now? How about if just type them into > the SAGE command line interface? > > Thank

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-21 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello Jaap, I'm having a hard time reproducing those doctest failures, and I was wondering if you might help me out. Do you still get the failures if you run sage -t on those files now? How about if just type them into the SAGE command line interface? Thanks, Mike On 9/21/07, Jaap Spies <[E

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-21 Thread Mike Hansen
> Many thanks for reporting this! > > This is from mike Hansen's new combinatorics code, I think. > I *am* able to replicate this on my Fedora Core machine, > and on none of my other 10 or so machines. Mike, any > comments -- I can give you an account on the machine if > necessary. > > This is no

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-21 Thread William Stein
On 9/21/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > William Stein wrote: > > Hi, > > > > SAGE 2.8.5 has been released at http://sagemath.org/. > > > > > NOTE: Since this is such a major release, there will likely be problems > > and a 2.8.5.1 release shortly to fix them. Please report! > > > >

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] sage-2.8.5

2007-09-21 Thread Jaap Spies
William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > SAGE 2.8.5 has been released at http://sagemath.org/. > > NOTE: Since this is such a major release, there will likely be problems > and a 2.8.5.1 release shortly to fix them. Please report! > Builds on Fedora 7,