We recently became aware of the build-problems on OSX. The fixes are
included in the next release of
CVXOPT (>0.9).
Joachim
On Oct 22, 4:16 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I had the following failure from "make test", fro
On 10/21/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I know what's going on.
>
> If you install the Gap optional packages, then reset the
> workspace you get the behavior I see. If you don't install
> the optional packages you don't. Thus one of the packages
> changes the print beha
On 10/22/07, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had the following failure from "make test", from devel/sage-main/
> sage/numerical/test.py. I'm guessing its from the convoluted history
> of my fortran installs on that machine (a powerpc apple powerbook):
You're right. We added some docte
I had the following failure from "make test", from devel/sage-main/
sage/numerical/test.py. I'm guessing its from the convoluted history
of my fortran installs on that machine (a powerpc apple powerbook):
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py
**
Successfully upgraded to 2.8.8.1 on linux (Kubuntu 7.04):
sage --testall
(...)
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 1978.6 seconds
John Cremona
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from thi
On Oct 21, 10:36 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see the same problem as others have reported, but I have no
> optional packages installed. If I run 'gap_console()', and then
> 'LoadPackage("hap");', I get 'failed' as output.
Yes, that's as expected. For 2.8.8, William (ac
On 10/21/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > gap> LoadPackage("hap");
> > Loading HAP 1.7.5gamma ...
> > true
> > gap> PolynomialRing(Rationals,2);
> > PolynomialRing(..., [ x, x_2 ])
>
> I see the same problem as others have reported, but I have no
> optional packages installed.
On Oct 21, 2007, at 10:04 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> I think I know what's going on.
>
> If you install the Gap optional packages, then reset the
> workspace you get the behavior I see. If you don't install
> the optional packages you don't. Thus one of the packages
> changes the print behav
William Stein wrote:
> I think I know what's going on.
>
> If you install the Gap optional packages, then reset the
> workspace you get the behavior I see. If you don't install
> the optional packages you don't. Thus one of the packages
> changes the print behavior of Gap.
>
> Indeed, here it
I think I know what's going on.
If you install the Gap optional packages, then reset the
workspace you get the behavior I see. If you don't install
the optional packages you don't. Thus one of the packages
changes the print behavior of Gap.
Indeed, here it is:
gap> LoadPackage("hap");
Loading
William Stein wrote:
> On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
>
> These are not typos. The behavior of gap-4.4.10 changed from that
> of gap-4.4.9, and the doctests reflect that change. Evidently for
> some reason your gap didn'
On Oct 21, 9:34 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
>
> These are not typos. The behavior of gap-4.4.10 changed from that
> of gap-4.4.9, and the doctests reflect that change. E
On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've released sage-2.8.8. Get it at http://sagemath.org, as usual,
> > or just do "sage -upgrade".
> >
>
> There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
These are not typos. The behavior of gap-4.4
William Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've released sage-2.8.8. Get it at http://sagemath.org, as usual,
> or just do "sage -upgrade".
>
There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
Jaap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
sage -t devel/sage-ma
14 matches
Mail list logo
