Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] combinatorial statistics

2014-05-28 Thread Viviane Pons
This is very very easy on you Don't you feel any responsibility at all > for what you put into Sage ? We had a conversation one year ago about ways > to fix that, one of which seems to suit you as you said on sage-devel just > yesterday. And when several persons tell you that your design has a

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] combinatorial statistics

2014-05-28 Thread Paul-Olivier Dehaye
Since you ask, here is a thread where you have insulted me repeatedly: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16403 Others might think I have asked for it, but that's a different question, and we can have that debate too if you want. But if we are going to have that debate, I would ask that you first send

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] combinatorial statistics

2014-05-28 Thread Nathann Cohen
Yo ! > I find it quite difficult now to follow this thread, I see the answer to some emails that are not even in the thread... This is because it was sent to both sage-devel and sage-combinat. After a while somebody anwers to only one group and mess follows. > Anyway, I just want to answer to th