On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> Dear category fans,
>
> Latest status report for the category patches:
>
> - They apply smoothly on 4.2.1 alpha0, with all test passing :-)
> (This is on a macbook pro ubuntu 9.4 with everything up to
> trac_4326-root_systems-nt.
Dear Dan, Anne, Mike, category fans,
I created a dummy patch sage-4.3 in our queue to delimit what is 100%
ready to be merged into Sage 4.3. So, to run the tests, you can just
qpush to sage-4.3 in the Sage-Combinat queue.
Dan, Anne: I just included #3663 and #5794 there. Could you pleas
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:26:05PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> The status is listed here:
>
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/query?status=positive_review&status=needs_work&status=needs_review&status=needs_info&status=new&group=status&milestone=sage-4.2.1
Thanks!
> On sage-release I
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
>
> Dear category fans,
>
> Latest status report for the category patches:
>
> - They apply smoothly on 4.2.1 alpha0, with all test passing :-)
> (This is on a macbook pro ubuntu 9.4 with everything up to
> trac_4326-root_syste
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:17:09AM +0100, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> Latest status report for the category patches:
>
> - They apply smoothly on 4.2.1 alpha0, with all test passing :-)
>(This is on a macbook pro ubuntu 9.4 with everything up to
>trac_4326-root_systems-nt.patch in the Sage-C
Dear category fans,
Latest status report for the category patches:
- They apply smoothly on 4.2.1 alpha0, with all test passing :-)
(This is on a macbook pro ubuntu 9.4 with everything up to
trac_4326-root_systems-nt.patch in the Sage-Combinat queue)
Mike: could you please run
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:20:34AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> > combinat.sagemath.org/code and /doc are now up to date!
>
> I was browsing on /doc in particular in the documentation of the
> categories. I must says that though it's still draft, it already looks pretty
> good. However, I can't
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:55:16PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> I looked at
> http://combinat.sagemath.org/hgwebdir.cgi/code/file/tip/sage/categories/number_fields.py
> and it looks good to me.
Thanks!
> > - Final comments on Groupoid (Robert)
That's the only one remaining!
> > - A positiv
Hi Nicolas,
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:23:28PM +0100, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> > > While browsing the code I realized that the files "entire_rings" and
> > > "ordered_sets" are still there. Didn't we agree in a name change? From
> > > sage one calls the right Domains() rather than EntireR
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:23:28PM +0100, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> > While browsing the code I realized that the files "entire_rings" and
> > "ordered_sets" are still there. Didn't we agree in a name change? From
> > sage one calls the right Domains() rather than EntireRings() but I
> > found the p
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:54:03AM -0800, javier wrote:
> > Here is an updated short status report for the category code. All test
> > pass now on 4.2! Here is what remains to be done:
> >
> > - A positive review on Rings (David K.? Javier?)
>
> Done and passed.
Great, thanks!
> While browsing
Hi William,
> Nick -- please please keep pushing this stuff!! It's really important
> to people that this all get in promptly. I would like to see as much
> as possible that the combinat branch get merged back into mainline
> sage.
You're not the only one !!! Here is the status of our b
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
>
> Dear category fans,
>
> Here is an updated short status report for the category code. All test
> pass now on 4.2! Here is what remains to be done:
>
> - A positive review on Rings (David K.? Javier?)
> - A positive review on ca
13 matches
Mail list logo
