On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Pavel Solin wrote:
>> Hi,
>> thanks for many useful hints.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:33 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Pavel
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Pavel Solin wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for many useful hints.
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:33 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Pavel,
>> >
>> > thanks a lot for the feedback on the notebook. I think
> * More of a python import thing. In this scenario, each worksheet
> has
> an optional filename. If you use python to "import
> some_other_worksheet", the path is set up such that the normal python
> import mechanism works. This gives you all of the normal python
> namespace mechanisms. To
William Stein wrote:
>>> (3) When image is saved and latex some text written to output, the
>>> image anyway appears after the text. So one does not
>>> have an opportunity to create a sequence of images
>>> with some text description below each of them. This should
>>> be
That editor seemed as fast as the native text area to me. I am also
using firefox 3.5.2 so it could be quite browser dependent.
On Sep 24, 7:11 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
>
> > Regarding syntax highlighting, I just found a list on wikiped
I don't notice any difference of speed (I'm on Firefox 3.5.2, btw.) It seems
that the editor works as an iframe in the document (that's how FCKEditor
(now CKEditor) works, too). The DOM traversal to add elements can be slow, I
guess. I haven't read the source code (I'll take a peek at it later) tho
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> Regarding syntax highlighting, I just found a list on wikipedia of editors
> we can use:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Javascript-based_source_code_editors
>
> CodeMirror (http://marijn.haverbeke.nl/codemirror/) seems to
Regarding syntax highlighting, I just found a list on wikipedia of editors
we can use:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Javascript-based_source_code_editors
CodeMirror (http://marijn.haverbeke.nl/codemirror/) seems to be the most
promising. Here's the demo:
http://marijn.haverbeke.nl/co
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> thanks a lot for the feedback on the notebook. I think every single
> point that you raised annoys me too and it should be fixed.
I fully agree. In the meantime, I did list a few workarounds for some
of the issues you have
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> thanks a lot for the feedback on the notebook. I think every single
> point that you raised annoys me too and it should be fixed.
>
> I have also CCed sage-devel.
>
> Ondrej
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Pavel Solin
Hi Pavel,
thanks a lot for the feedback on the notebook. I think every single
point that you raised annoys me too and it should be fixed.
I have also CCed sage-devel.
Ondrej
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Pavel Solin wrote:
> Hi,
> by now I spent many hours with programming inside the
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
