On 12/09/2016 09:54 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:50:15PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>> On 12/07/2016 01:26 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> If you look at the patch [1] that was applied, there is a new check for
>> tp_new(). I'm not 100% sure that's what causes the problem
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:50:15PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 12/07/2016 01:26 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> If you look at the patch [1] that was applied, there is a new check for
> tp_new(). I'm not 100% sure that's what causes the problem, but it looks
> suspicious.
>
> [1] https://bugs.pyth
On 12/07/2016 01:26 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> What is the problem really? Neither from reading the bug report nor from
> reading this thread do I understand what exactly changed in Python
> 2.7.13 causing this breakage.
>
If you look at the patch [1] that was applied, there is a new check for
t
I created a ticket for this upgrade:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22037
But we should first upgrade to Python 2.7.12 before we can tackle 2.7.13:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19735
Anyone willing to work on the Python 2.7.12 upgrade? It would at least
make it easier to debug the problem
What is the problem really? Neither from reading the bug report nor from
reading this thread do I understand what exactly changed in Python
2.7.13 causing this breakage.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this gr
On 12/07/2016 11:07 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 12/07/2016 10:57 AM, Francois Bissey wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/12/2016, at 21:15, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016-12-07 04:17, Francois Bissey wrote:
But I am not sure how to do the
__new__ = object.__new__ in cython.
>>>
>>> You certainly
On 12/07/2016 10:57 AM, Francois Bissey wrote:
>
>> On 7/12/2016, at 21:15, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-12-07 04:17, Francois Bissey wrote:
>>> But I am not sure how to do the
>>> __new__ = object.__new__ in cython.
>>
>> You certainly cannot do that since Cython's __new__ does non-trivia
> On 7/12/2016, at 21:15, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2016-12-07 04:17, Francois Bissey wrote:
>> But I am not sure how to do the
>> __new__ = object.__new__ in cython.
>
> You certainly cannot do that since Cython's __new__ does non-trivial stuff
> like setting the vtab for c(p)def method ca
On 2016-12-07 04:17, Francois Bissey wrote:
But I am not sure how to do the
__new__ = object.__new__ in cython.
You certainly cannot do that since Cython's __new__ does non-trivial
stuff like setting the vtab for c(p)def method calls. This is also
partially the reason why cannot even implemen
I am guessing we should something more fundamental in
sage/structure/sage_object.pyx
since we are dealing with SageObject classes.
But I am not sure how to do the
__new__ = object.__new__ in cython.
François
> On 7/12/2016, at 15:25, than...@debian.org wrote:
>
> When setting __new__ = object.
Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 01:43:09 UTC schrieb tha...@debian.org:
>
> On 12/07/2016 01:27 AM, François Bissey wrote:
> > On 07/12/16 12:20, tha...@debian.org wrote:
> >> Hi sage-devel,
> >>
> >> we're almost ready to upload Sage to Debian (in fact we basically have
> >> to upload it this
On 12/07/2016 01:27 AM, François Bissey wrote:
> On 07/12/16 12:20, than...@debian.org wrote:
>> Hi sage-devel,
>>
>> we're almost ready to upload Sage to Debian (in fact we basically have
>> to upload it this week to make sure it's included in the next Debian
>> release).
>>
>> However, on Sunday
On 07/12/16 12:20, than...@debian.org wrote:
Hi sage-devel,
we're almost ready to upload Sage to Debian (in fact we basically have
to upload it this week to make sure it's included in the next Debian
release).
However, on Sunday python 2.7.13rc1 was uploaded to Debian and now we
are facing a bu
Hi sage-devel,
we're almost ready to upload Sage to Debian (in fact we basically have to
upload it this week to make sure it's included in the next Debian release).
However, on Sunday python 2.7.13rc1 was uploaded to Debian and now we are
facing a bug that I didn't quite manage to work around y
14 matches
Mail list logo
