Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: remove SAGE_UPGRADING

2014-09-30 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:51:05 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2014-09-30 08:24, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > I certainly agree with this, but it should be said that "make" will take > > a longer time when changing packages. For example, you will see ATLAS > > being rebuilt very f

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: remove SAGE_UPGRADING

2014-09-30 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-09-30 08:24, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I certainly agree with this, but it should be said that "make" will take a longer time when changing packages. For example, you will see ATLAS being rebuilt very frequently (it has many dependencies and if one of those changes, ATLAS will get rebuilt). O

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: remove SAGE_UPGRADING

2014-09-30 Thread Francois Bissey
It is certainly on "intel" and making strides on arm. It covers a few other archs through inheritance from gotoblas2 but it doesn't support power7, never mind power8. I can discuss those more in details for anyone interested. François On 30/09/2014, at 21:15, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > I also a

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: remove SAGE_UPGRADING

2014-09-30 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
I also agree with the removal, with the issue of ATLAS. Maybe we should switch to openblas (IIRC Clément Pernet said it is more state of the art nowadays) :) On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:15:59 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17072 > -- You received t

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: remove SAGE_UPGRADING

2014-09-30 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17072 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send emai

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: remove SAGE_UPGRADING

2014-09-29 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-09-29 22:58, Volker Braun wrote: I propose to remove the SAGE_UPGRADING variable and make it act like it would be always "yes" (instead of "no", which is the current default). Right now, we sabotage "make" to not rebuild dependencies of rebuilt packages. So you don't have to wait long for

[sage-devel] Proposal: remove SAGE_UPGRADING

2014-09-29 Thread Volker Braun
I propose to remove the SAGE_UPGRADING variable and make it act like it would be always "yes" (instead of "no", which is the current default). Right now, we sabotage "make" to not rebuild dependencies of rebuilt packages. So you don't have to wait long for your broken Sage installation. The onl