Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Very short release cycle for Sage 9.4

and PARI/GP (#30801 needs review BTW) But I don't think it is a good idea to squeeze package upgrades in a short release cycle. To my mind, these standard package are more welcome in early beta of a standard release cycle. Though, most of these packages are already in their upgraded versions in s

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Very short release cycle for Sage 9.4

There are also a couple of standard package upgrades to FLINT and arb. David On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:44 PM Dima P

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Very short release cycle for Sage 9.4

We should also update GAP and start using gappy. On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:36 AM François Bissey wrote: > > I guess I could whip up a branch quickly since we know the things that have > to be done overall. > I would prefer if we had a new pynac release rather than continue pilling > patches. >

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Very short release cycle for Sage 9.4

I guess I could whip up a branch quickly since we know the things that have to be done overall. I would prefer if we had a new pynac release rather than continue pilling patches. François > On 11/05/2021, at 11:00, 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel > wrote: > > +1 on this. I know many people

[sage-devel] Proposal: Very short release cycle for Sage 9.4

... with a focus on adding support for gcc/gfortran 11 (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31786) and in particular fixing the build on macOS Big Sur with homebrew that was broken by homebrew's upgrade to gcc 11 (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29703). -- You received this message because you