On 12/19/2014 10:14 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, December 19, 2014 4:03:44 PM UTC+1, Bruno Grenet wrote:
>>
>> I've changed recently the status of a ticket to "needs review" since I
>> think it is not relevant anymore, and I wanted it to be closed. I now
>> guess it is not the
On Friday, December 19, 2014 4:03:44 PM UTC+1, Bruno Grenet wrote:
>
> I've changed recently the status of a ticket to "needs review" since I
> think it is not relevant anymore, and I wanted it to be closed. I now
> guess it is not the right approach... What should I do in such a case?
>
> Put
I've changed recently the status of a ticket to "needs review" since I
think it is not relevant anymore, and I wanted it to be closed. I now
guess it is not the right approach... What should I do in such a case?
For concreteness it is ticket #2907
(http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/2907) that as
Hi all,
See http://trac.sagemath.org/report/30 for the 283 tickets currently
needing review. Wow!
I want to encourage people to take a little time to look at these, because
I think that many of them are either painfully easy to review, or in fact
are not needing review at all.
Painfully easy
