On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2011-02-18 00:27, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> 2) The ticket description can be *edited*, comments not. For example,
>>> if some comments just mention a new spkg, then the patchbot will
>>> automatically think it's a dependency, even when
On 2011-02-18 00:27, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> 2) The ticket description can be *edited*, comments not. For example,
>> if some comments just mention a new spkg, then the patchbot will
>> automatically think it's a dependency, even when it's not.
>
> Again, I see this as a disadvantage, because t
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let me propose that the patchbot would *only* look at the ticket
> description and not comments to check for spkgs, patches, dependencies
> and so on. I can see two major advantages:
>
> 1) People will be forced to write such in
Hello,
Let me propose that the patchbot would *only* look at the ticket
description and not comments to check for spkgs, patches, dependencies
and so on. I can see two major advantages:
1) People will be forced to write such information in the ticket
description where humans can also easily find
